Throwaway Belts - Good or Bad? Are there any now?

[Rich Cranium]

All of the belts known as "throwaway", that no longer exist, i.e. hardcore, European, cruiserweight. Should they have been expired or did they have revelence? Also, are there any existing titles that can be written off? I know unification of all titles is in the plans, but what do you guys think?

[merhardt03]

All of the belts known as "throwaway", that no longer exist, i.e. hardcore, European, cruiserweight. Should they have been expired or did they have revelence? Also, are there any existing titles that can be written off? I know unification of all titles is in the plans, but what do you guys think?
Hardcore & European needed to go over time. The CW, IMO, very well could have stayed but WWE sees nothing in a lightweight division. Im for unifying the Raw & SD world titles but not so much for the IC & US titles. Too many mid-carders from TWO shows going after ONE belt. Nawww man.

[Robstar]

I agree with everything merhardt03 said. WWE needs one more singles title if they merge the big 2 and there's little doubt that it should be CW/LH. If WWE continues to ignore their mid-low card talent, hell, TNA just might catch them by the tail

[Kid_Gangsta]

WE all knew that the hardcore, and euro belts were gonna die eventually. Right now the WWE is trying to get rid of these belts to solve there problems but its just gonna make their problems worse. Atleast they RETIRE their belts so hey http://i51.tinypic.com/8zeccl.gif

[Splattered-Dreams]

I think the lack of a CW/LH division is harming the product. Some of their most gifted wrestlers can't even get onto TV any more.

[The Brown One]

I think the lack of a CW/LH division is harming the product. Some of their most gifted wrestlers can't even get onto TV any more.

It's sad that Vince thinks America don't take to lighter wrestlers. Theyr'e perhaps the most entertaining thing, in terms on wrestling, on the shows.