YOUcanCALLmeCRACK
08-16-2012, 10:01 PM
Lately I have found it interesting observing how WWE deals with the 2nd and 3rd generation wrestlers they hire. I wonder if there is any rhythm or reason into who they let have the family name and who they do not.
On one hand I completely understand why WWE wouldn't want a bunch of young guys running around with last names that were made famous years ago. It could potentially devalue the famous name, make the young stars feel unnecessary pressure to live up it the name, or make the WWE seem like a place that is only trying to rehash the past. It is really amazing all the talent they have that are 2nd or 3rd generation these days. (please feel free to try and name them all below)
On the other hand I feel it is a little messed up that the WWE doesn't give the talent the chance to keep their famous last name.
When it comes down to it, I wonder why they let Randy and Cody keep their names. Why DiBiase Jr. got to keep his but his younger brother couldn't. I would think Flair's daughter would be named Flair even though "The Nature Women" sounds terrible.
What are your thoughts?
On one hand I completely understand why WWE wouldn't want a bunch of young guys running around with last names that were made famous years ago. It could potentially devalue the famous name, make the young stars feel unnecessary pressure to live up it the name, or make the WWE seem like a place that is only trying to rehash the past. It is really amazing all the talent they have that are 2nd or 3rd generation these days. (please feel free to try and name them all below)
On the other hand I feel it is a little messed up that the WWE doesn't give the talent the chance to keep their famous last name.
When it comes down to it, I wonder why they let Randy and Cody keep their names. Why DiBiase Jr. got to keep his but his younger brother couldn't. I would think Flair's daughter would be named Flair even though "The Nature Women" sounds terrible.
What are your thoughts?