PDA

View Full Version : Jerry Lawler Vs Undertaker WM?



TheMiz
02-18-2011, 10:35 AM
What do you guys think ? would jerry give taker a good fight at wrestlemania? would it be a good match? could it happen? i personally would like to see this even tho i know jerry doesent have a chance to win

thejman93
02-18-2011, 10:39 AM
I'm not a huge fan of the idea really. That's a match TNA would make. If they could pace the match right it could work but......eh....

Dameduse823
02-18-2011, 10:41 AM
I think that if king was a few years younger it would have been an awesome idea, and it would be a great 'old school' match. But I don't think its gonna happen. Undertaker's streak is something way to big to have a match with a guy who isn't a full time wrestler for the company

SaberToothTigerz
02-18-2011, 10:48 AM
r u serious with me?

Rich Cranium
02-18-2011, 10:50 AM
Lol, wut? jk, but Jerry is going to be possibly busy with Cole and also I don't think even Jerry himself would entertain this idea at this stage of his career. !0 years ago, maybe, but now, no.

Automatic
02-18-2011, 11:03 AM
Aw hell no.

Xv DREWBIE vX
02-18-2011, 11:34 AM
lol that would be a disgrace, lawler is way past his prime, and id rather see riley michael cole or miz job to lawler and not the undertaker.

Lowki
02-18-2011, 11:57 AM
Undertaker has about two wrestlemania matches left in my opinion (20-0 streak) so it would be stupid to waste it on Lawler. They are both well past their prime and it just wouldn't be that entertaining imo.

Snair
02-18-2011, 11:57 AM
This wont be good.

JLeeDude1892
02-18-2011, 03:21 PM
Undertaker has about two wrestlemania matches left in my opinion (20-0 streak) so it would be stupid to waste it on Lawler. They are both well past their prime and it just wouldn't be that entertaining imo.

Taker isn't past his prime yet, because when he wrestles, he still kicks ass. Maybe he'll be past his prime in a couple years, but just because he's getting older doesn't mean he's past his prime.

6maximum6carnage6
02-18-2011, 03:26 PM
Jerry Lawler (now) vs UnderTaker? "you just need to get that thought right out ya head" lol, but i cant see it bro sorry. maybe like 10 15 years ago.

KSTornado
02-18-2011, 03:27 PM
Taker isn't past his prime yet, because when he wrestles, he still kicks ass. Maybe he'll be past his prime in a couple years, but just because he's getting older doesn't mean he's past his prime.




That's like saying Kevin Nash is not past his prime.

The Brown One
02-18-2011, 05:06 PM
Hell Taker would have to slow down for Jerry in the match! Besides, storylines for WM are already 90% in place.

ToWhomItConcerns.
02-18-2011, 06:13 PM
did someone just compare Kevin Nash to the Undertaker?

lol...thats even funnier than the idea of King vs Taker. not that i don't like King its just that it would make no sense at all.

Saiga
02-18-2011, 06:19 PM
Jerry Lawler vs Undertaker in a "Save Michael Cole or JR on a Pole Match"

ShockMaster
02-18-2011, 07:05 PM
Jerry Lawler vs Undertaker in a "Save Michael Cole or JR on a Pole Match"

I'm pretty sure neither of them would choose to save cole.

Stump
02-18-2011, 10:46 PM
There is simply no way that it would work, for the simple reason that there is no believability. After all, who could believe that Lawler could stand a chance with Taker.

Rich Cranium
02-18-2011, 10:57 PM
Jerry Lawler vs Undertaker in a "Save Michael Cole or JR on a Pole Match"

Are you Vince Russo? Because anything that has to do with a pole is either a stripper or a Russo swerve!

Rick BoA
02-19-2011, 12:56 AM
I know the idea floating around is Lawler vs Cole, but that wont really be a match. they should do Lawler vs Cole&Riley. The story would make sence and they could make it a wrestling match, unlike the bret hart vs mcmahon. Maybe Riley could turn on Cole and have Jerry save him, making cole a face and not obsessed with the miz, and cole/lawler would be friends again.