PHENOMINAL ENIGMA
08-08-2011, 11:14 PM
Alot of people say that WWE is so much better then TNA but I really dont think any of people saying that actually consider alot of thing. IMO TNA is far superior to WWE if you factor in how much more money WWE has, How many hours a week they have of programing each week & how well each company uses their rosters.
TNA has a better X, Tag & KO's divison then WWE & they would be about equal in ME's lets face it without CM punk WWE would need a few years to build the division back up.
WWE has minimum 6 hours of programing a week which is twice as much as TNA. WWE has only 12( even less since the recent firings) more on a roster then TNA yet they cant utalize their roster as well as TNA IMO.
Also 1 last thing that pisses me off yet is people complaining about Hogan taking up 2 much TV time which IMO is BS especially the last month or so he has barely been on TV but no 1 seems to say anything about how HHH is now taking time on both SD & Raw
feel free to agrue but really try an factor in what i say b4 commenting. also sorry if this is a bit more like a blog rather then a forum
TNA has a better X, Tag & KO's divison then WWE & they would be about equal in ME's lets face it without CM punk WWE would need a few years to build the division back up.
WWE has minimum 6 hours of programing a week which is twice as much as TNA. WWE has only 12( even less since the recent firings) more on a roster then TNA yet they cant utalize their roster as well as TNA IMO.
Also 1 last thing that pisses me off yet is people complaining about Hogan taking up 2 much TV time which IMO is BS especially the last month or so he has barely been on TV but no 1 seems to say anything about how HHH is now taking time on both SD & Raw
feel free to agrue but really try an factor in what i say b4 commenting. also sorry if this is a bit more like a blog rather then a forum