2011 should have been won by christian
2003 should have been won by kane
the rest was fine
i totally 100% disagree with all these statements
Cena was the biggest star in the company, there was no need for him to win this Rumble
Have to disagree with this one,back then i was still watching wrestling on TV and didint knew anything,about WWE but raw(also believed wresling was real back then ) as you can guess i was a big cena fan,and when they showed how cena returned at rumble,i almost pissed myself of happiness D,but seriusly i dont know if it was known on internet that he returns or no,but it was an amazing moment and amazing match,not everything in wrestling should be to just push someone else,some needs just to get some awesome moments,and as it been sayed it also gave credibility to ppv itself
"yes but if you read clearly, I mentioned I would have booked CM Punk doing his promos in 2010 (the ones he did in summer of 2011). And Cody would be doing his gimmick in 2008"
I did read clearly but these superstars need time to develop, by your logic, the WWE would've gone at 5 times the speed it normally does, Cody Rhodes wasn't even really involved in anything serious in WWE till late '07 with Bob Holly. Plus it would've left you with no Legacy, no feud between Orton, Rhodes and DiBiase, DiBiase and Rhodes' partnership this year wouldn't have worked. Plus, The Rock vs John Cena angle hadn't happened yet. That was a major part of Punk's angst in his shoot a few months back. He hated that the 'ass kissers' were in the main event of mania. This blog shouldn't be titled "Wrestlers who should have won the Royal Rumble" it should be "If I was head booker in WWE how would I book the past 12 years".
quit taking it so seriously, fine next time I will actually POST the obvious since some people take others opinions extremely seriously and can't see the difference between reality and fantasy
Originally Posted by Mr. McMahon
I think you don't understand the concept of the blog. If Rock wins RR 99 obviously I wouldn't have him booked as champion, he would probably have lost the belt before the rumble. And the Eddie/Lesnar match would still happen, just at a different time.
As for Eddie, I just booked him as if he were alive. I think you need to look up the word fantasy
for 1 if your gonna fantasy book you shouldnt say "This blog is about wrestlers who I think should have won a past Royal Rumble instead of the person that actually won it".... and if your gonna fantasy book than atleast do something entertaining with it Like.
Example #1. in 2003 Shawn Michaels is Champion and Eddie Guerrero wins the Royal Rumble. Then the match at Wrestlemania is set Michaels vs Guerrero Ladder match.
either its terrible Fantasy booking or unrealistic real booking.
Originally Posted by B-ri
Punk didn't get over fully until mid 2011, I don't think Del Rio deserved such a quick push but it would've made Punk's rise to the top cheap compared with how it eventually worked out plus he was still leader of the Nexus at this point, apart from that you raise some good points also apart from the Cody Rhodes win in '08, he was still yet to really get over and gain any sort of credibility. Apart from that, nice blog
yes but if you read clearly, I mentioned I would have booked CM Punk doing his promos in 2010 (the ones he did in summer of 2011). And Cody would be doing his gimmick in 2008
© 2011 eWrestlingNews, All Rights Reserved.