matt hardy is a good wrestler hes just really bad at cutting promos, i thought were he was was just fine

No, no and no...

Lol, this is an obvious troll.

I'd only agree with Mr. Kennedy but you're either a TNA mark or are a retard. The highlight of Matt Hardy's career I'd of said was his spots against Kane during his feud for Lita. Shelton Benjamin's over-rated by all of the internet fans so I'm not sure why he's on the list. Umaga although he's passed on was feuding with main event and upper mid-card talent but still doesn't deserve to be there since it was a brief period.

Bobby Lashley wasn't in WWE long enough or committed although I respect him he still should have never held the titles. Jeff Hardy for cruiserweight also made no sense considering that title's based around getting athletes who aren't over the beginning of their push. Jeff Hardy (was/is) already over so I don't see the purpose in that.

The only reason I'd agree with Mr. Kennedy is because Randy Orton persuaded him to be released. So I felt like due to a bad hand being involved with his career he'd of achieved more since he's reached a peak in his potential at TNA.

Bad list, probably a troll.

My list of people who should've been World Champion/WWE(F) Champion only has two names on it

Roddy Piper
Vader

Really disagree about Matt Hardy deserving to be either a WHC or WWE champion.
It's your personal opinion, but you don't have any reasons why any of these should be champions. It's just a list, not a blog.
Why, for example should Matt be WWE champ over Jeff? Who I think most people would say was always the bigger draw of the two.

tournament mode from svr 2009

General Manager Mode, Better Announce Table gameplay, and the ability to litter the ring with tables all need to be included.