I have commented on your video like 3 times through youtube and even this website haha. But I completely agree with everything you say. I am an advocate of divas fighting as well.

I am sick of all those people when they automatically see two divas in the ring consider it a bathroom break. Divas have been able to put on amazing matches in the past, and just because the business is different does not mean they cannot now.

WWE Merchandise from www.wwegifts.com includes a huge variety of WWE Clothes, WWE Gift UK, Shirts, Hats, Wristbands at everyday low discounted prices. WWE SHOP Satisfies All WWE Wrestling Merchanidise Needs For The Wrestling Fan In All Of Us

Originally Posted by nrb6304

And what im saying is no he is not. That title was ruined a LOONG LOONG time ago. Id imagine WM 23 when Undertaker won the RR was to challenge Batista and then went on 5th at WM.ONE MAN ALONE cannot ruin the oldest American Title. But going on 5th at WM CAN. Since that year the World Title really hasnt meant shit.

Plus, by your logic HHH tarnished the WWF Title in 1999 when he needed to CHEAT TO WIN. And then again in 2000 when after two months of beating Cactus Jack in a street fight and a hell and a cell he needed Vince and Stephanie to retain the title at WM. Sound strong to you?

Dolph #1 is doing fine.
#2 WHC already ruined bud (sorry)
#3 He's been champion 3 weeks. Relax. 9 times out of 10 WWE gives you what you want.

HERE LEMME ASK YOU THIS: ADR beats Ziggler tonight. But if Dolph would have won, wouldnt it make ADR look weak?! How can they do that to the former World Champ??!! They've ruined him and his title reign cause he lost to Dolph! Right?

Dude the champ ain't gotta win every match. Ric Flair at the PEAK OF HIS CAREER lost more then he won. Because he would lose every match uuntil the title was on the line. Same thing with Hunter, Cena, Edge, Hulk.

Hey im not saying I enjoyed the Pizza segment either. But if you want the WWE to come to a city near you. The Sonic and the Dominoes ads stay. Honestly get over it IWC get over it.

So your saying a time slot decides if a title is legit or not? Having all the big matches happen right after the other wares the crowd out, watch WM 25.

Originally Posted by Vandarius

After the first sentence I had to stop reading.

I think The Shield is overrated. They do a sloppy triple powerbomb ... Yay?

Yes, they have good mic skills but not perfect skills. WWE will have them "dominate" for a few more months, they'll finally lose and then be midcard or jobbers.

No one has perfect skills.

Originally Posted by Cross

I have to say Dashing Rachel, this is the best blog I have seen you type. And the whole social media deal just turns our 3 hour Raw back into 2 hours. I mean when Raw was going to be 3 hours, I expected more time for stars to get pushed, and storylines to grow. I was wrong. Again, well done the blog.

Thanks!

I have to say Dashing Rachel, this is the best blog I have seen you type. And the whole social media deal just turns our 3 hour Raw back into 2 hours. I mean when Raw was going to be 3 hours, I expected more time for stars to get pushed, and storylines to grow. I was wrong. Again, well done the blog.

Your pizza comments were absolutely hilarious! As well as the fillers of the night. They were so dumb. Anyways, my expectations are not real high for Raw, so in terms of what WWE is today, I liked it due to match quality. Plus the AJ Kaitlyn backstage segment was helpful for them.

And I would have prefered a Submissions Count Anywhere Match at first but the Ladder Match has better storytelling I think with all of them winning MITB, however the Submissions Count Anywhere could have been a heck of a lot better due to the stars inserted in the match. It was the perfect chance to bring it back. But in the end, ladder matches are just more entertaining to the majority audience. I for one am happy they are doing a ladder match cause who else could of done one and make it make sense in a rivarly?