Hey Guys & girls
Now i've been thinking about this years Wrestlemania. To be honest, untill now, I like it. The build up is good, the characters that face each other are amazingly picked out. I mean, come on. They even gave Michael Cole & Jerry "The King" Lawler a match. Like I said, I'm interested.
Especially the match between The Undertaker and Triple
Updated 03-15-2011 at 11:49 AM by Frank
Fresh off of watching TNA, I decided to go on with Part 2 of thoughts as a reborn-again wrestling fan. I will start this post off as I did Part 1 and I'll list a few things of note:
I started watching TNA in November when I attended a house show in Connecticut.I know the history of the company very well.I consider TNA a viable competitor to WWE.
Hey guys hope all is well. People are wondering why we have to watch another Triple H vs The Undertaker match at Wrestlemania and I think I came up with the reasons why. Im cutting straight to the point.
Nobody was built up enough to challenge him
The year 2010 was the year to push all the young talent that was worthy of a push. The WWE did a great job in pushing talent but
Updated 03-14-2011 at 12:55 AM by Frank
Monday Night Raw
Overall I would say it was a better than usual show, but it wasn't without it's flaws. Starting out with the good is just about every promo on this show was pretty entertaining. I had no real gripes on any of the promo segments on this show, and I also thought HBK did an excellent job(via titantron) on pushing this fued with Taker and HHH. Taker himself did pretty well,
Note this is my first post here, and English is my second language, so keep the grammar-policing on the light side please!
3 weeks away from the main event of the year and only 6 matches are cut in stone. In this post I'll make my predictions for those 6 matches as well as share some thoughts on how to improve what seems like a rather weak card.
Now, lets start with
Updated 03-12-2011 at 04:17 PM by Iscariot
Welcome back boys and girls. I know my last blog was not the most popular thing ever, but that's sometimes the case when it comes to people's opinions. So let's move on to our next matter. I recently read an interesting blog by someone talking about how the "attitude era" has pretty much marked the end of gimmick wrestlers, save a select few...most notably being the Undertaker. You see,
Hello my fellow wrestling/sport entertainment fans,
I know the WWE's main focus is on the WWE Championship match at WM 27, since it involves its current "poster children" - The Miz and John Cena. In addition, The Rock will play a very critical role in this buildup. I love the fact that WWE is letting these three men, in particular to Cena and the Rock, let them being themselves
I'll be honest, I am a fan of the WWE. I feel they are a very smart organization who knows how to put on a decent family friendly show. I say decent because they do not focus on the older males in the family. Instead they are trying harder to reach the children and women, hence John Cena in the top seat. He is a very charismatic individual who has the exact same appeal that Hulk Hogan once had.
Updated 03-10-2011 at 08:53 AM by JamFran
Welcome back faithful readers. I've been doing a lot of thinking on what to write about next, and I feel like it's necessary to redo a subject that I touched on once in the past. This is obviously the matter of who's being wasted in the respective wrestling brands. Now due to the ever changing storylines in wrestling, I may end up having to write about this on a fairly regular basis. Since RAW and
Updated 03-09-2011 at 06:22 PM by Frank
With the Undertaker's recent return and the subsequent confrontation with Triple H, it brought to the fore an often overlooked fact. Triple H spoke of himself and the Undertaker being the last of an era. While those words are true, their meaning rings a little deeper for the Undertaker, for he is the last of the gimmick wrestlers.
Back in the late 80's and early 90's the wrestling
Updated 03-08-2011 at 04:54 AM by The O.V.
© 2011 eWrestlingNews, All Rights Reserved.