http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/community/blog.php?360-Hotrod-Coolbeans Wrestling News and Discussion - eWrestlingNews.com Community en Tue, 21 May 2013 16:58:32 GMT vBulletin 10 http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/community/images/misc/rss.jpg http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/community/blog.php?360-Hotrod-Coolbeans http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/community/entry.php?260-What-s-with-all-the-HATE-towards-Bound-For-Glory Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:57:21 GMT What's with all the HATE towards Bound For Glory?

Okay, so I watch Bound For Glory, then I log onto this website to see what the rest of you guys thought of the PPV, and to my amazement the vast majority of the EWN community hated the show, and i mean hated it, with a passion!!
Which begs the question, did you guys watch the same PPV as me??

The PPV I watched had one of the best tag team matches in recent memory (no not the Young/Jordan vs Ink Ink match), MCMG vs GenMe, it had everything, a super quick pace, high flying, spectacular moves, and brilliant chemistry.

The PPV I watched had a very solid X-Division Championship match, a very good monster's ball match, a good Lethal Lockdown match, and a decent knockouts title match.

Also the show I watched had a very good, solid main event, including a controversial, yet intriguing finish. It had me and my wife on the edge of our seats, in shock and disbelief.

This blog, however, is not a review of Bound For Glory.

The main focus of all the bitching seems to be aimed at said finish, which most of you are p*issing all over, but why??

Think about it...........................

The Hogan and Bischoff heel turn makes complete sense, they want full control of the fastest growing wrestling company in the world.

Jeff Jarrett's heel turn makes complete sense, he has seen his company taken away from him by Dixie Carter (hell, she even suspended him from his own company) and he see's Hogan and Bisch as his way to regain some control once again.

Also, after i read so many of you saying "the Hardy heel turn doesn't make sense" after only a few days has passed since BFG, my advice to you is this;
HAVE SOME PATIENCE AND WAIT AND SEE, IM SURE IT WILL BE EXPLAINED!!

Seriously guys, who did you want "THEY" to be?
nWo? Nexus? Shane McMahon? Paul Heyman??
Come on!! There is no better heel in the biz than Eric Bischoff, most "fans" hate him anyway. Add to that the complete power trip i see him adopting, plus the backing of Abyss and the world champ, Jeff Hardy, and you got yourself one hell of a pr*ck that people will tune in to just to see the crap getting beaten out of him.

Final Thoughts

*If you didn't watch any of the build up to Bound For glory, you will not get it!

*If you prefer the kiddie-friendly style of WWE, you will not get it!

*If you are a sheep and you follow everybody else, you will not get it

*If you dont get it now, you are never gonna get it, so stop pretending to get it..................................YOU DONT!! ]]> Hotrod Coolbeans http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/community/entry.php?260-What-s-with-all-the-HATE-towards-Bound-For-Glory http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/community/entry.php?82-Why-TNA-does-NOT-need-Paul-Heyman Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:32:25 GMT Before I begin, let me start by saying I believe Paul Heyman is a creative genius, Paul Heyman is a visionary and Paul Heyman is one of the greatest... Before I begin, let me start by saying I believe Paul Heyman is a creative genius, Paul Heyman is a visionary and Paul Heyman is one of the greatest minds in pro wrestling history. However..............................

I have read so many TNA "fans" going on and on about how Heyman would save TNA, and about how TNA needs Heyman, but my question is this...... Does TNA need saving???

Lets consider some facts shall we my fellow wrestling fan. First off, the ratings for iMPACT! in the USA are increasing (i admit slowly) and over here in the UK the viewing figures show that iMPACT! often beats WWE RAW and constantly beats Smackdown, NXT, and all the other programs that VKM puts out. Considering these facts, does TNA need Heyman?

The storylines in TNA over the past several months have been exciting, intriguing, and intelligent (ev2.0, abyss/them, sting/nash alliance, hogan/bischoff/JJ conspiracy to name but a few). Does TNA need this side of the product saving?

The matches over the past several months have also been amazing to say the least, with the MCMG vs Beer Money series springing to mind, along with Angle vs AJ, Joe vs Hardy, RVD vs Abyss and many more. I guarantee you would not see wrestling like that in WWE. Does this need saving?

TNA is currently a profitable company, making more money than it is leaking. Did ECW ever make a profit??
TNA wrestling is only 8 years old and has way more fan awareness than ECW did, and i dare say more awareness at this early stage than WWE and WCW had at their respective 8 year stage. If TNA is this big after just 8 years, where could it be in another 8 years? another 12 years? 20 years? the possibilities are endless.

And where was Paul Heyman throughout all of this? Where has Paul. E been for the last 8 years? not in TNA thats for sure.
TNA has grown massively, both in stature and in production, without Paul Heyman, and it will continue to grow, with or without paul Heyman.

Would Paul Heyman be good for TNA? yes
Would TNA benefit from Paul's experience, ideas and knowledge? of course
Does TNA need Paul Heyman? Hell no!!!!!

Thanks for reading guys, feel free to leave comments/feedback. ]]> Hotrod Coolbeans http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/community/entry.php?82-Why-TNA-does-NOT-need-Paul-Heyman