]First blog here so bare with me everyone. =)
Anyways I want to give my thoughts on who or what type of wrestler in their current wwe status should win the royal rumble.
first of all my initial thought of the rumble was that it is a way to put a young star completely over with the fans. You win and your in with the big boys and back in the days that's how it usually worked, with the occasional big star winning it. Il excuse stone cold winning three times because he is the greatest wwe superstar ever.
Anyways when I fully got in to wwe, the late chris Benoit won it, which made me angry like who the fuck is this mid carder winning and getting the main event. But as I grew older and wiser I got it, you give someone who's never got a chance..a chance. Batista won the following year and that was played beautifully with the evolution betrayal and thumbs down antics. Big fan of Batista btw a true WHC (unlike the current champion..sorry but DB just doesn't sell it for me yet) but yh this is what the rumble can do for you.
when wwrestlers like triple h, the rock, hbk etc have won the royal rumble and have gone to achieve greatness , it seemed like the writers feel 'hold on, all great superstars need to have a royal rumble win under their belt' then they relise there in a conundrum, they've realised the great John cena has achieved greatness in the business with out winning the royal rumble, so what do they decide to do, yes give him a win (his return was quite exciting ..ain't gona lie doe lol).
Then that became the trend, if you are to be considered amongst the greats you need to have a rumble to your name. So then the following years randy ortan and edge would go on to win the rumble literally wasting that year for ounces talents who could of gone further...

regardless last year the creative team had the correct idea of giving the rumble win to a wrestler whos not quite there which I respect and hope they keep in mind for this year. My only problem last year was that...Alberto del rio?? A man with hardly any heat and literally just came in to the wwe..and surprise surprise the man i personally feel was literally a complete flop last year.
So who should win this year?
Cody Rhodes - when legacy started everyone predicted ted to be great but I liked Rhodes from the start..the look the name the mic skills and with a lil more gym a good body (No Homo) for him to wrestle at the standard his starting to achieve. So my choice would him but I also wouldn't mind wade berett, I think the wole IWC is on this guy so I don't need to explain what's great about him lol.
BUT pleaaasseee don't give it to chris Jericho, who I relise the a lot of the IWC is supporting. But come on...I don't mind the guy fighting cm punk for the wwe title at wrestlemania, I'm sure he'll put on a good show, I know he will..but what's the point giving the ryoal rumble 2012 to someone who lets be honest will leave again in 6 to 7 months, and probably make sme other crap return(seriously what was raw about??..fuck that shit lol)

As I said before there's this trend that establishes wrestlers don't look good enough if they have never won the royal rumble..so I have a feeling there going to do that with Jericho.
Ryal rumble is the ultimate way to becoming a star, and I feel lately because of the over usage of MITB, which to me is a pussy way to become a champion..it's just how I feel, sorry.
anyways rhodes to win the rumble..and I won't accept any other wrestler winning for the second time.

Ite first blog so go easy on me, ...in a bit everyone =)