undertaker vs. hhh
by , 03-28-2011 at 11:58 PM (2482 Views)
has anyone else noticed that wwe has not brought up the fact that triple h has lost to taker before at wrestlemania 17? i'm curious to hear from anyone as to why this may be as i have not a clue. i think it could have been used as a good part of mind games on takers part against triple h. also triple h is the 3rd person taker has faced for a second time at 'mania. why do they have him face people he has beaten before, any ideas anyone?






Email Blog Entry
