Originally Posted by
Viperfish
I don't hate the Rock, I hate WWE for needing to do that to sell PPVs and generate interest in their product. It's not the Rock's fault that he still has more star power in the wrestling world after years of inactivity than the boys in the full-time roster do now. I gotta emphasize wrestling world because the Rock being in Hollywood isn't fair to factor into the equation. The Rock did not compete that long for WWE... I mean Jesus you look at guys like Cena and Orton and they've actually competed longer than The Rock has on a full-time basis and they're nowhere near as over(Cena with the kids is at least comparable).
There's something to be said for unpredictability though. If you guys insist on guys climbing the ladder and earning their shots and things all being done a certain way... then don't turn around and lament the product for being predictable and stale. It's not like we're going all David Arquette on things. Also, how dare the Undertaker not compete all year and automatically get a Wrestlemania match while guys work their tail off all year and don't even get a dark match at Wrestlemania. Same thing, right?