I couldn't even stand reading this post. I found myself wanting to correct the bad grammer.
As it stands, Wrestlemania will have Cena winning the title. The Rock is only here for a short period of time before returning to Hollywood (yet again.) Rock beating Punk was and is all a publicity stunt by WWE to get the title and match more mainstream appeal. Rock is taking the belt to all his movie premiers, and will be hyping his Wrestlemania match against Cena. The only question is "will Punk be part of the match?" Rumors are spreading that Undertaker might not even compete this year, and if he doesn't, where does that lead the man who held the title for the longest reign of the modern era. No where other than to be placed in the main event so that Cena's win will be more monumental. Cena's reign though will be short lived once WWE realizes that once again that this is the same old shit, in a new pile. The championship will be in a transitional phase once again, bouncing between Cena, Punk, Ryback, and god knows who else, like Austin, Rock, HHH, Foley in the attitude era, until it finally lands in the hands of a superstar that that want to establish as a main stay force.
Now I see people replying to the first post but I don't understand it, can someone that does and has argued against it give me the gist? Not meant to be insulting to the op, I have dyslexia and I find it really hard to read something that is badly structured.
Oh right, think I've got it. Well then I guess my answer is that I cant see it happening. If they ever do turn Cena heel it wont be due to a part timer (I don't think they'll turn him for a long time if ever) I'm expecting it to end with mutual respect for the yearly feel good moment
Cena will never turn heel and he will win. Dispite I hate John Cena....CASE CLOSED