Getting rid of the U.S. title isn't going to do dick to add "prestige" to the Intercontinental title as that does absolutely nothing to address the fundamental issues with why the titles currently hold no substantial value.
Originally Posted by CrossfaceChickenwing
Making one title more prestigious by eliminating another is right up there with thinking that your girlfriend is somehow going to get hotter by telling her less attractive friend to go home for the night.
They is lot wrong with wwe programming today:mad:
1.The PG ratings.
2. The show is 3 hours long.
3. And these damn filler matches. Why don't they try and give the mid carders actual good feuds.
4. Most mid carders don't even have a character. They just come out and wrestle unproductive matches.
5. Kofi Kingston as champion.
6. The show is not edgy like it used too be.
7. The mid card titles are a complete joke.
It pretty agreeable doing away with one of the mid-card titles or any title want solve a problem..... But will and would make things more cluttered, esp for the mid-carders who struggle to stay in the mid-card....
The TV rating isn't the problem, one has to remember before WWF/WWE was TV-14 in the 90s they was more PG before hand and had more success then IMO.... Also it not the writers.... WWE might have the most talented group of creative writers ever... It might be the lack of approval or changes the head creative make to shows and PPVs Vince, Triple H, Steph and etc....
The length of Raw well yeah it to long, 3 hours haven't really paid off I would cut back to 2 and half hours, other then specials like Old School, Slammys and etc....
Filler matches esp between the co Main Events of a PPV.... Either promote the match a week in advance or 3 days in advance or don't have it all...
Lots of the mid-carders do have a character it just isn't recognized....
Then with the show not being edgy like it use to be, what else is there that can be done that hadn't already been done or could even strike a nerve with the public???