Taker will never lose at WM before he retires....bank on it! He will go down in history as the only undefeated wrestler at WM because for him to lose now would be pointless.
The last posts pretty much sum up my feeling. Why would he lose? What purpose would it serve? Put someone over? 'Taker could just as easily lay down for an up and comer at some other PPV, if they really need to have that person go specifically over the Undertaker.
But look at it this way - beating UT at WM doesn't guarantee long term success for any wrestler. Then what are you going to do? What are you left with? A dirty smear on a legacy you spent years building.
Be a bit hard to sell streak dvds if you shit on the ending.
Want to help bring down the Efeds? Call 1-800-RobstarLovesVickie today!!!
That's not the question we should be considering. The question you want to ask is "What will you reaction be when Ryback destroys the undertaker's streak! Hell, What will your reaction be to Ryback having a 20-0 streak at EVERY PPV, EVER. EVER."
That's not the question we should be considering. The question you want to ask is "What will you reaction be when Ryback destroys the undertaker's streak! Hell, What will your reaction be to Ryback having a 20-0 streak at EVERY PPV, EVER. EVER."
Piss on Ryback! It's hilarious all this talk about Ryback this Ryback that, what if Ryback yada yada yada.....oh my!!!
Title says it all. I would be pissed off because not only should that go to an up and commer like Rhodes, Ryback, Barrett, or Ziggler, but also since Lesnar has only comeback to the WWE for the money.
I honestly don't think the Lesnar/Taker match is going to happen. And 'Shit No' to your other suggestions. Taker, if he wrestles at Mania again, DOES NOT lose.
Bookmarks