
Originally Posted by
CM_SUXX_NOT
1. Hype can't be fake. They are really HYPING their match.
2. The idea that they're WORKED shoots means they're fake.
3. There is more to wrestling than The Rock vs John Cena. WWE is about short matches, promos, cheap pops, entertainment and PPV hype. Companies like TNA and ROH work towards the wrestling side of the business. They sound more suitable for you.
If my points aren't valid and I'm just being a dick, let me know guys. I'm just tired of people bitching and whining about the negatives when there are so many positives. If Cena wants to semi-shoot on The Rock, cool. If Cena's made out to have the upper hand, cool. Not every feud has to be face vs heel (fair enough, it helps) but when it's a match as big as this; when two generations collide, you don't need a heel.
CM Punk's shoot was a worked shoot. It was a planned shoot where he went off an ACTUAL things. Having a fake worked shoot where you pre-plan having written notes so you can shoot on it is just dumb. Cut a damn promo that's good enough to win the audience instead of some fake-pseudo shoot.
I've been watching WWE and wrestling for like 15 years now you don't really need to say "TNAs more suitable to me" as if I've never heard of the company or don't know that TNA or ROH are more inclined to the "wrasslin aspects".
The two Rock first bits were funny tonight, but it dragged on (WHICH IS FINE). But the fact that they INTENTIONALLY PLANNED for it to drag on, in order to get the other guy over, is just stupid. It's a face vs face match, if the audience wants to choose 75-25% then so be it. The other guy just isn't as over then.
Also, I don't understand the point of having a super serious Cena promo (which was a good promo). I LOLed at the part about him being on the "Rock's List of beaten guys" when in the last couple of Rock matches he's lost to Evolution, Hurricane, Goldberg. And Cena's tapped out more big guys than the Rock's beat.
Bookmarks