
Originally Posted by
Glamour Girl
How about Kelly Kelly being a backstage slut as the website news suggested or Melina as well for that matter and Sunny's drug abuse and also the stories of her being a slut back when she was in the company should those be off limits or should they be fair game? The Candice Playboy thing should be fair game cause it was very public, but personal stuff I'm not sure.
Those are are you say suggestions/rumors. None of us, unless we know the Superstars in question or they themselves open to it, can confirm much of these rumors. So why use them? Arrests maybe, but that's a bit personal and it would have to be determined by creative if the storyline needs it.
The 2006 edition of Playboy could be used but the ones she was in previous to being in the WWE are subject to approval. Again, that's a bit personal (we don't know the reason behind their actions (again unless they open up to it)) so there's no need to attack characters on that level (promo or IC) unless the feud demands it. Like people attacking Punk's straight edge lifestyle and the history behind it as Jericho did in the real WWE and the masked man did in the GAB did here in the WWE fed.
It's sometimes better to leave certain things unsaid and kept in the dark and here in the WWE fed we can't make that call as to what can and cannot be said, that's creative's job. If you feel the storyline your characters are in can benefit from using bits of the past like arrests, drug use, etc. you can suggest it to creative but the decision lies within them to use it or not. We may not sometimes like it but it's their choice and it should be respected. Move on and look towards the future of they have planned for the fed and enjoy the ride along the way.
Bookmarks