Is Goldberg the Undertaker's WM27 Opponent?

[Rich Cranium]

Goldberg has recently stated that he would "face the Undertaker in a NY minute". Jim Ross even said if all the stars are aligned correctly that it could happen although he's not sure if he's right for UT. Obviously since Lesnar is out of question, Goldberg vs. UT would generate a huge payday. BTW, I'm sure it would also cost WWE a huge payday to make it happen. Thoughts?

[SilverGhost]

Lol

At first it appeared to me as Goldust xD

Anyways, I don't think Goldberg is Taker's opponent but I would like to see that match happen!

[Rich Cranium]

Lol

At first it appeared to me as Goldust xD

Anyways, I don't think Goldberg is Taker's opponent but I would like to see that match happen!

Hey, if they can't get Goldberg, Goldust is readily available at a discount.

[Belzova]

Hey, if they can't get Goldberg, Goldust is readily available at a discount.

Did you know they are brothers? *kidding*

[SilverGhost]

Did you know they are brothers? *kidding*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzne-...ext=1&index=38

Goldust meets Goldberg!

(Though no love for Silver T.T)

[SilverGhost]

Hey, if they can't get Goldberg, Goldust is readily available at a discount.

Goldust vs Taker!

Why the hell not?

[Robstar]

Please allow me to invent some infinite wisdom on the spot. No. Fucking. Way.

Why? Why should Goldberg be allowed to waltz back into not just WWE, but the bloody main event of their premiere showcase PPV, undoubtably getting paid a shitload and waltzing back off into the sunset at his leisure? What sort of message does that send to the rest of the roster?

Let's for a moment take a look at Goldberg's wrestling career. The man was fortunate - for whatever reasons - to receive possibly the biggest, most intense single push ever seen in the industry. Most of the matches in his 'streak' were just plain squashes, meaning his work rate was bugger all. He never had to work his way up the same way so many others had to and I'm pretty certain he was promised from the beginning he'd be pushed all the way to the top, effectively cutting in line.
Goldberg has no interest if he is not a top guy - you can believe that. The Rock gets so much criticism for walking away from the business yet Goldberg did the same and the fans continue to be fascinated by him. Goldberg was also very ordinary in the ring and a stiff worker to boot.

So, to main event Wrestlemania 27? Only to lose? What's the point of that? To end the streak? Again, what's the point of destroying something like that just to walk away again? There isn't one.
The only way I can see this working convincingly would be if Goldberg signed a 1 year deal with WWE and they build it up for Wrestlemania 28. C'mon Bill, give something back!

[TNA 'The very best']

Please allow me to invent some infinite wisdom on the spot. No. Fucking. Way.

Why? Why should Goldberg be allowed to waltz back into not just WWE, but the bloody main event of their premiere showcase PPV, undoubtably getting paid a shitload and waltzing back off into the sunset at his leisure? What sort of message does that send to the rest of the roster?

Let's for a moment take a look at Goldberg's wrestling career. The man was fortunate - for whatever reasons - to receive possibly the biggest, most intense single push ever seen in the industry. Most of the matches in his 'streak' were just plain squashes, meaning his work rate was bugger all. He never had to work his way up the same way so many others had to and I'm pretty certain he was promised from the beginning he'd be pushed all the way to the top, effectively cutting in line.
Goldberg has no interest if he is not a top guy - you can believe that. The Rock gets so much criticism for walking away from the business yet Goldberg did the same and the fans continue to be fascinated by him. Goldberg was also very ordinary in the ring and a stiff worker to boot.

So, to main event Wrestlemania 27? Only to lose? What's the point of that? To end the streak? Again, what's the point of destroying something like that just to walk away again? There isn't one.
The only way I can see this working convincingly would be if Goldberg signed a 1 year deal with WWE and they build it up for Wrestlemania 28. C'mon Bill, give something back!

could not agree more with you, pointless waste of money for one night only.

[FaceOfSpades]

Goldust vs Taker!

Why the hell not?

i thought the same thing...remember the rivalry? only thing i didnt like was that it was pretty gay (wwf language=bizzare) but if they could seriously get goldust over as the heel he once was that would be epic. it angers me knowing it will never happen but at least i have svr

[Mr. McMahon]

It just doesn't make sense. Goldberg was a babyface his whole career, why would he challenge Undertaker out of all the guys on the roster? I don't see how it can fit with any storyline. If anything, Goldberg should face Austin (who mentioned he can still wrestle) seeing as Austin stunned Goldberg on WM20. They can use that as a storyline to turn Goldberg heel, that he was humiliated & embarrassed by Austin on the biggest stage of them all after a victory against a very tough opponent.

The storyline could be that Goldberg doesn't want his last moments in the ring to be of him getting stunned by Austin, so he challenges him to a match at WM, with Brock Lesnar as special guest referee. It would all make sense.

Besides Goldberg vs Austin has been a dream match for over 10 years, it would make more more than Goldberg vs Taker.

Taker will either face Sheamus, Cena or Kane. Actually for a change I wouldn't mind seeing Undertaker in the MITB match. It would be more interesting and hard for him to keep his streak since he now has 8-9 opponents and everyone wants to win that match, not only the briefcase but also taker's streak.