I'm hearing a lot of chatter about how Brock Lesnar losing was bad for business since he's coming back from an 8 year absense, and now instead of seeming like a big threat to everyone else, he now just seems like a regular superstar losing his first match back....I disagree. Here's why.....
John Cena really needed this win, he's been on a losing streak, and for the face of the WWE, that's just not good. He doesn't need to come across as the guy who all these big guys who are returning will just plow over to make an impact. Yes, he lost to the Rock, that was to be expected. But Brock Lesnar...everyone on God's green earth expected Brock Lesnar to come in, wrestle once a month, win all his matches, and just destroy people. Cena beating Lesnar was a welcome twist imo. This doesn't take anything from Lesnar, especially since Cena seemingly won by LUCK after being dominated the entire match. Lesnar put on the most offense, looked the most impressive in this match, and even though he lost, he still looked like the winner in the end. If Cena really takes time off to heal his nagging injuries, then they can do a storyline with Lesnar saying he put Cena on the shelf, that maybe he didn't get the 3 count, but really he still won because he's the one who can still compete. Losing a match because of one move after dominating the entire match doesn't make him look any less dangerous. Plus, if Cena is taking time off, and if they do an injury angle, it's different, because usually they make the "injured" person lose because they are "injured" it's a slightly different twist, and I for one believe that WWE is taking a step in the right direction with this. Maybe it will give us a chance to sit back and enjoy the show rather than talking about the backstage politics of "why they booked that" like we've been doing over the past number of years.
Bookmarks