
Originally Posted by
XxJPPRxX
Honestly has anyone looked at what wwe could be doing but not hinting at it at all ... Rock vs. Undertaker . IMO i think this would be better than Brock vs. Rock , or Cena vs . Taker . When they could easily do Cena vs. Taker at Wrestlemania 30 as a big headliner. if Rock vs. Undertaker went one on one that would leave: Brock Lesnar, John Cena, Cm Punk, maybe Triple H, maybe Shawn Michaels, Randy Orton, Sheamus, Daniel Bryan and Kane all vacant. if so i think it would look like this
Rock v Taker
Brock v Shawn v Triple H
Cena v Punk ( Wwe Title - with added stip)
Orton v Sheamus ( WH Title - with added stip )
i know most wouldnt agree with this but it would sell more tickets than Wrestlemania 28 and make vince a hell of a lot of money.
Initially, this got me thinking, what's this guy on about? But it got me thinking about who might face Undertaker. So rather than making a thread about it - surely the first one of those - I'll just give you what I thought here.
What I think would be cool was have Daniel Bryan with Kane face Undy, with the inevitable ending where Kane turns on Bryan once and for all and he and the Undertaker "hug it out" on the grandest stage of them all. Or not, there could be the double turn. Then Undy has got, if they extend Lesnar's contract, by promising him 'Taker at WM30. Not to win, mind you. And in case Lesnar pulls a, well....Lesnar, then he's got a backup opponent in Kane.
Just spitballing here.
And Shawn isn't coming back. (I would LOVE to say this with 100% conviction, but the best I can offer is 95%)
Bookmarks