The Undertaker's WM Streak

[CricketTragic]

Not as much maybe, but I'm not sure how he'd have come out on Raw the next night and justified it. He most certainly would have been booed then.
Breaking the streak just comes off as a heel move to me.

I dont think Rock should be the one, With that being said do you believe that no one has the right to beat the streak?

[Poot-Hair]

I dont think Rock should be the one, With that being said do you believe that no one has the right to beat the streak?

I don't believe anyone has the right to end the streak. It's 'Taker's baby. He's worked hard for it and he deserves to retire undefeated at wrestlemania.

What I do propose is having maybe the Rock(or some other higher up talent) take Taker to his limits like Haitch did the year before last, then Taker wins, and retires because he can't wrestle at "that level" anymore.

I'll say it'll happen 2 WM's from now.

[Krysys]

I dont think Rock should be the one, With that being said do you believe that no one has the right to beat the streak?

NO ONE has the right to defeat the Streak, it should remain intact when Taker retires

[Tommy Thunder]

I dont think Rock should be the one, With that being said do you believe that no one has the right to beat the streak?

No, I wouldn't say that nobody has the right to, but IMO, why build up something as amazing as a 20-0 undefeated streak at Wrestlemania, only to break it by having the guy lose a match, especially to a guy who's towards the end of their career like a HHH, HBK, Rock etc? It doesn't add anything to those guys, so why have them break it?

On the other hand, what about having a young guy breaking it? Well to that I do say that nobody has the right to break it.
Having a young star breaking the streak is a HUGE push to give to someone. Like astronomical. You're talking about a guy putting a stop to one of the biggest streaks in wrestling history. Is there any young guys out there that deserves that opportunity? Keeping in mind that Taker is only realistically going to make it to a few more Manias (I'd say WM 30 will be his last), is there any young stars between now and 5 years time that deserves that honor? IMO, no.

Taker's already got one of the best resumes in the history of the business, but an undefeated Wrestlemania streak as big as 20 (and counting) is just something that will NEVER be replicated. Having someone break it isn't right IMO.

[CricketTragic]

No, I wouldn't say that nobody has the right to, but IMO, why build up something as amazing as a 20-0 undefeated streak at Wrestlemania, only to break it by having the guy lose a match, especially to a guy who's towards the end of their career like a HHH, HBK, Rock etc?

On the other hand, what about having a young guy breaking it? Well to that I do say that nobody has the right to break it.
Having a young star breaking the streak is a HUGE push to give to someone. Like astronomical. You're talking about a guy putting a stop to one of the biggest streaks in wrestling history. Is there any young guys out there that deserves that opportunity? Keeping in mind that Taker is only realistically going to make it to a few more Manias (I'd say WM 30 will be his last), is there any young stars between now and 5 years time that deserves that honor? IMO, no.

Taker's already got one of the best resumes in the history of the business, but an undefeated Wrestlemania streak as big as 20 (and counting) is just something that will NEVER be replicated. Having someone break it isn't right IMO.

I agree with you wholeheartedly in this statement and I have been imaging in my mind who could be the one to break the streak and where would they go from there.

It certainly should be a part timer like Rock or Lesnar.

Definitely not a already made star in Cena or Orton so on and so on.

So it would have to be a young star about to recieve the push of all pushes and although I dont believe anyone deserves that push two names come to mind.

Barrett and Ziggler

In saying them two though I believe they are high enough without needing shall I say Burden of having to cop the abuse they would receive by beating the Undertaker at wrestle mania? I think not?

I have this feeling though and I have had it for some time that Kane will be the Undertakers final opponent at Wrestle mania 30 and I prey to god as much as I love Kane that he does not end the streak.

[Tommy Thunder]

I agree with you wholeheartedly in this statement and I have been imaging in my mind who could be the one to break the streak and where would they go from there.

It certainly should be a part timer like Rock or Lesnar.

Definitely not a already made star in Cena or Orton so on and so on.

So it would have to be a young star about to recieve the push of all pushes and although I dont believe anyone deserves that push two names come to mind.

Barrett and Ziggler

In saying them two though I believe they are high enough without needing shall I say Burden of having to cop the abuse they would receive by beating the Undertaker at wrestle mania? I think not?

I have this feeling though and I have had it for some time that Kane will be the Undertakers final opponent at Wrestle mania 30 and I prey to god as much as I love Kane that he does not end the streak.

I'll be honest, as good as both are, not even Ziggler or Barrett deserve the "push of all pushes" as you so aptly described it.

IMO, there isn't a single young guy that deserves it, and there isn't a single more experienced guy that needs it.

Taker's streak should stay intact until he calls it quits.

[The Brown One]

NO ONE, AND I MEAN NO ONE DESERVES TO END THE STREAK. The Undertaker's streak is the most prestigious thing ever in wrestling, greater than any Royal Rumble, 5 star match, MITB, or title. I believe that is justification enough as to why no one should end the streak.

There also aren't many that are believable as the one to break the streak, with possibilities being: Chris Jericho, The Rock and John Cena. It would be interesting to see a younger star take on The Undertaker, like Barrett, but the streak should NEVER end.

[Playboy Stevie V]

I don't think anyone deserves or should break the streak.

But if it HAD to be done and I HAD to pick who gets to do it, I would pick Kane and they both retire and walk out with Paul Bearer.

Dont know why, but thats the only scenario I would be okay with.

[CricketTragic]

I'll be honest, as good as both are, not even Ziggler or Barrett deserve the "push of all pushes" as you so aptly described it.

IMO, there isn't a single young guy that deserves it, and there isn't a single more experienced guy that needs it.

Taker's streak should stay intact until he calls it quits.

You dont think that breaking the Undertakers streak would be the push of all pushes?

[Spectroheliographies]

The streak in my opinion will not end. However, WWE doesn't "create," good in-ring talent like they used to. Don't get me wrong Daniel Bryan's awesome but he isn't as physical as some of the older rosters meaning rather than WHO should end the streak I think the question we should be asking is WHO could hold a match with The Undertaker who's ageing and still make it an amazing match. Without it just being steel chair here steel chair there, bruises and bumps.

That's my children, is why Kurt Angle shouldn't have jumped ship. Not derailing the topic, but he'd of held Taker better than anyone on the current roster in my opinion. I mean could you imagine Taker taking an angle slam, Kurt pulling down his straps and locking in the ankle lock. The guy always looks brutal when he does it so everyone would be pleased.

That's just my opinion though, rather than WHO should break the streak the question you should of asked is WHO could hold up someone as old as the Undertaker for perhaps what's become one of the if not the most iconic match in Wrestlemania.