WWE Happenings *All The Small Things*

[WoodenBulldozer]

I agree and disagree with you. I agree that a feud with Ziggler would be awesome because they are both so similar in appearance and attitude. Instead of a one week feud though, I would like to see it stretched out over a course of a few weeks where Gunn starts by interrupting Ziggler during a promo, then maybe interferes in his weekly matches, mocks him backstage etc. Good concept though.

[Datoneirishguy]

They enjoyed his interactions with Shawn Michaels during the show and they were impressed with the physical state he was in. You have to remember that Billy is in his late 40's like 48 49

[Datoneirishguy]

Yeah thats what I was trying to get at but i didnt want to ramble on and have a really long thread

[Dennis]

I think billy could be interesting to bring back every once in awhile as like a plot mover. though IMO he should stay out of actual in ring competition and leave that to the younger superstars.

[Datoneirishguy]

I think billy could be interesting to bring back every once in awhile as like a plot mover. though IMO he should stay out of actual in ring competition and leave that to the younger superstars.

Thats why I feel it should be once off so he can put one of the younger superstars over.

[Darkside Ron Garvin]

So after I read the report on the website I started thinking of a scenario for him to have that last match and who he should put over. As much as I loved the NAO and would be happy to see a reunion I would much rather see "Mr Ass" go one on one with none other then Dolph Ziggler 'no shock there'. Billy Gunn was one of the most underused superstars back in the day and IMO deserved to hold that World title once. As a mid card face he always got a massive pop. He was very good in the ring aswel and quick on his feet and agile for a big man. I know he wouldn't be quite as nimble but thats why having him face dolph would help.

Here's some food for thought... A list of the top 10 wrestlers win/loss percentage on RAW.

RANK	WRESTLER	WINS	LOSSES	DRAWS/NC	DIFFERENCE	MATCHES
1	John Cena	274	88	29	+186	391
2	Shawn Michael	148	66	22	+82	236
3	The Undertaker	125	50	25	+75	200
4	The Rock	128	73	24	+55	225
5	Billy Gunn	127	79	16	+48	222
6	Triple H	213	166	47	+47	426
7	Randy Orton	186	139	22	+47	348(347)
8	Steve Austin	77	33	24	+44	134
9	Chris Benoit	97	56	8	+41	161
10	Rob Van Dam	99	61	6	+38	166

My question is, how can a guy who had more matches, more wins, and a higher win/loss percentage than the likes of RVD, Benoit, and even Triple H still be considered "underused"? Remember, this is as a SINGLES competitor, not his tag teaming (Smoking Gunns, New Age Outlaws). He had a GREAT run in the E but to say that he was "underused" is a stretch. My opinion.

[Dennis]

Here's some food for thought... A list of the top 10 wrestlers win/loss percentage on RAW.

RANK	WRESTLER	WINS	LOSSES	DRAWS/NC	DIFFERENCE	MATCHES
1	John Cena	274	88	29	+186	391
2	Shawn Michael	148	66	22	+82	236
3	The Undertaker	125	50	25	+75	200
4	The Rock	128	73	24	+55	225
5	Billy Gunn	127	79	16	+48	222
6	Triple H	213	166	47	+47	426
7	Randy Orton	186	139	22	+47	348(347)
8	Steve Austin	77	33	24	+44	134
9	Chris Benoit	97	56	8	+41	161
10	Rob Van Dam	99	61	6	+38	166

My question is, how can a guy who had more matches, more wins, and a higher win/loss percentage than the likes of RVD, Benoit, and even Triple H still be considered "underused"? Remember, this is as a SINGLES competitor, not his tag teaming (Smoking Gunns, New Age Outlaws). He had a GREAT run in the E but to say that he was "underused" is a stretch. My opinion.

nice point.. may I ask where you got that stat from?

[Cabers]

Billy Gunn vs Dolph Ziggler just book it!!

[Darkside Ron Garvin]

nice point.. may I ask where you got that stat from?

Go to google and search "Wrestling Data" and you will find a vast world of wrestling facts. These are strictly by the numbers but it helps you get a better grasp of things when the numbers are right in your face. It doesn't take into account the angles, or stories, but there are ways to get to the shows and cards to see "quality" of products.

I would post the site I use directly, but I'm not sure if posting outside websites is acceptable as I know it is frowned upon.

[Robstar]

Pfffft, I don't think there's a problem with posting links to other sites, really. As long as you're nice about it and aren't simply attempting to poach users, I fail to see where the problem may lie.