Would this re-interest you in WWE?

[The Brown One]

^^ Well said.

If you marks honestly think that a few chin/wrist locks and a submission finisher make someone a technical wrestler, and that in turn makes them an entertaining wrestler you are delusional.

I'd rather see someone who can wrestle lengthy matches in the ring rather than run his mouth on the mic cutting simple promos that simple people eat up.

[Rick BoA]

I'd rather see someone who can wrestle lengthy matches in the ring rather than run his mouth on the mic cutting simple promos that simple people eat up.

The Rock wrestled some of the most classic matches in recent history. Remember his matches against stone cold at WM? They were great. His match against angle was great. His matches against Jericho, Booker T, Undertaker and his iron man match against hhh? all great.
I would rather see a 20 minute interesting match then a 60 minute match of 2 guys holding each other. Jericho vs Punk at WM was the biggest letdown ive seen in a very, very long time.

[The Brown One]

The Rock vs Austin was good, not great. And the others were good too, but seriously, it's not like they were the best matches of all time or anything. But I do agree with you about Punk vs Jericho, it was a bit of a letdown. They wasted weeks with Jericho trolling, had great buildup, and then had a good match at Mania that could have been the best match on the card.

[Rick BoA]

I never said they were the best matches of all time but for those who think that in order for someone to have a good match they need to have 45 minutes of hammer locks is absurd.