View Poll Results: Re-Interested in WWE?

Voters
47. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    16 34.04%
  • No

    31 65.96%
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 64 of 64
  1. #61
    Black Ninja! The Brown One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Auckland, NewZealand
    Posts
    8,574
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick BoA View Post
    ^^ Well said.

    If you marks honestly think that a few chin/wrist locks and a submission finisher make someone a technical wrestler, and that in turn makes them an entertaining wrestler you are delusional.
    I'd rather see someone who can wrestle lengthy matches in the ring rather than run his mouth on the mic cutting simple promos that simple people eat up.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by The Brown One View Post
    I'd rather see someone who can wrestle lengthy matches in the ring rather than run his mouth on the mic cutting simple promos that simple people eat up.
    The Rock wrestled some of the most classic matches in recent history. Remember his matches against stone cold at WM? They were great. His match against angle was great. His matches against Jericho, Booker T, Undertaker and his iron man match against hhh? all great.
    I would rather see a 20 minute interesting match then a 60 minute match of 2 guys holding each other. Jericho vs Punk at WM was the biggest letdown ive seen in a very, very long time.

  3. #63
    Black Ninja! The Brown One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Auckland, NewZealand
    Posts
    8,574
    Blog Entries
    4
    The Rock vs Austin was good, not great. And the others were good too, but seriously, it's not like they were the best matches of all time or anything. But I do agree with you about Punk vs Jericho, it was a bit of a letdown. They wasted weeks with Jericho trolling, had great buildup, and then had a good match at Mania that could have been the best match on the card.

  4. #64
    I never said they were the best matches of all time but for those who think that in order for someone to have a good match they need to have 45 minutes of hammer locks is absurd.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

© 2011 eWrestlingNews, All Rights Reserved.