Whats next for Velvet Sky?

**Great One** · 07-27-2012, 08:42 AM

Anyone think the beautiful people will reunite in WWE?

**Darkside Ron Garvin** · 07-27-2012, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by Wade Barrett 1979

Beth Phoenix, Natalia, Ivelisse Velez, Britani Knight, Tamina Snuka, Buggy Nova and soon to be Sara Del Rey disagree. The difference is Vince has no regard for the division.

By "can go" I mean that these girls are given time to show off their skills. You can be the best wrestler in the world (I am a VERY big fan of Del Ray's work) but if no one gets to see you, then how will they ever know? And from what I understand, Del Rey is not going to be used as a on-screen talent, but is going to be working with the up and coming diva's in developemental. At this point, it's still rumor, so HOPEFULLY she will get to be given the ability to showcase her talent... But right now, they "can't go" in the ring... Not due to lack of talent or skill, but due to the lack of oppritunity.

**Lowki** · 07-27-2012, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by YOUcanCALLmeCRACK

Are we ever going to hear the end of that stupid cliche?

Until Hogan leaves or they stop pushing so many ex-WWE wrestlers, i'd say no.

Besides her entrance, Velvet isn't that good.

**Wade Barrett 1979** · 07-27-2012, 09:40 AM

Originally Posted by Darkside Ron Garvin

By "can go" I mean that these girls are given time to show off their skills. You can be the best wrestler in the world (I am a VERY big fan of Del Ray's work) but if no one gets to see you, then how will they ever know? And from what I understand, Del Rey is not going to be used as a on-screen talent, but is going to be working with the up and coming diva's in developemental. At this point, it's still rumor, so HOPEFULLY she will get to be given the ability to showcase her talent... But right now, they "can't go" in the ring... Not due to lack of talent or skill, but due to the lack of oppritunity.

You have a different meaning to 'can go' to what I'm normally used to then. I've never heard of being given ring time as 'can go' in the ring. You learn something new.

**Asherdelampyr** · 07-27-2012, 09:47 AM

Velvet brings a lot of positive attention to TNA, and is hot as hell, but yeah, she can't really wrestle all that well.

She's like TNA's version of K2, with a few differences
Better ass
Not afraid of the ropes (totally other direction there)
bit better wrestler
much better thighs. (Trust me)
Less prone to be caught on camera pissing into a sink (Huge bonus)
Overall will TNA lose a whole lot by letting Velvet ride off into the sunset? No, but on the other hand the indy experience could do Velvet a world of good, because she still has potential and time to really improve, and having to go all over the place working different styles is always the best way to learn imo

**Darkside Ron Garvin** · 07-27-2012, 09:51 AM

Originally Posted by Wade Barrett 1979

You have a different meaning to 'can go' to what I'm normally used to then. I've never heard of being given ring time as 'can go' in the ring. You learn something new.

No you are correct in the terminology. It is used for wrestlers who are known to be excellent technicians inside the ring; they "can go" out and perform, no matter their opponent. I was using it in a different aspect that isn't commonly used. It is more or less the idea that "if Bryan Danielson can go, but is not on one of the major companies, how do people really know that he can go?" It's the same with all wrestlers. Take PAC for example. People such as us who are invested into the industry have seen his work and know he has the talent to be one of the best high flyers in the business, but staying in DragonGate, only a select group of people know just how far he "can go." Same goes with the recent emergence of Tyson Kidd. Most don't know his abilities as a singles wrestler due to lack of TV time. Once he gets put on TV, now he can showcase his talent and "prove" to the casual fan that he "can go", whereas the "hardcore fan" already knows this fact...

But you are right in the definition of the term "can go". I just chose to use it from a different perspective.

**Wade Barrett 1979** · 07-27-2012, 10:13 AM

Originally Posted by Darkside Ron Garvin

No you are correct in the terminology. It is used for wrestlers who are known to be excellent technicians inside the ring; they "can go" out and perform, no matter their opponent. I was using it in a different aspect that isn't commonly used. It is more or less the idea that "if Bryan Danielson can go, but is not on one of the major companies, how do people really know that he can go?" It's the same with all wrestlers. Take PAC for example. People such as us who are invested into the industry have seen his work and know he has the talent to be one of the best high flyers in the business, but staying in DragonGate, only a select group of people know just how far he "can go." Same goes with the recent emergence of Tyson Kidd. Most don't know his abilities as a singles wrestler due to lack of TV time. Once he gets put on TV, now he can showcase his talent and "prove" to the casual fan that he "can go", whereas the "hardcore fan" already knows this fact...

But you are right in the definition of the term "can go". I just chose to use it from a different perspective.

Fair do's. I'm always up for learning new tilts on phrases.

**Poot-Hair** · 07-27-2012, 10:18 AM

This makes me sad in pants. Very very sad in pants.

I'll just youtube her to see her labia as she straddles a middle rope. All will be well in pootie land

**Asherdelampyr** · 07-27-2012, 10:19 AM

Originally Posted by Poot-Hair

This makes me sad in pants. Very very sad in pants.

I'll just youtube her to see her labia as she straddles a middle rope. All will be well in pootie land

hate to see her go, but love to watch her leave