So, after reading a certain (non articulated, non elaborated) post, I decided to post this, because I just don't see it.
Ok, let me rephrase. I do like Damien Sandow. I think he plays his role well, and he has the skills to succeed to some level. He, in a way, reminds me of the days when Steven Richards and Right to Censor ran around "cleaning up" the WWF. But I don't understand where the obsession comes from. Sandow, in my personal opinion, has all the tools to be a long standing upper midcarder, but I can't seem to see the guy as a future WHC. Some guys just aren't meant for it (it still to this day pains me to realize that Swagger will never again hold that belt, but I think I'm alone on that one). Zack Ryder, for instance. Love him or hate him, the guy gets huge pops. And if he stays in good graces with the company, I can see him going good places. Midcard? Definitely. But he's never gonna be the guy Headlining Wrestlemania. He just isn't. Sandow falls into that category for me. It takes a certain "It" factor to break that threshold, and I just don't see "it" in him. Not now, at least.
So, what is it that I'm missing with Sandow? Thank you in advance (Yes, I know what I just set myself up for

).
Bookmarks