Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by PSOjedi
Who wouldn't ??? !!!!! 
By the way, I vote for WWE Amp'd. It's not the bad of a name actually.
- Names of WWE Saturday Morning Show
View Poll Results: Which name for the new WWE Morning Show on Saturdays do you like (best)?
- Voters
- 26. You may not vote on this poll
-
WWE Saturday Morning Slam
14 53.85% -
WWE Jakked
4 15.38% -
WWE Amp'd
6 23.08% -
WWE Supercharge
2 7.69% -
WWE Turbocharge
0 0%
Results 11 to 20 of 21
-
08-06-2012, 12:02 PM #11Black Ninja!
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- My high horse.
- Posts
- 12,952
Saturday Morning Glory.
-
08-06-2012, 12:18 PM #12That would be me. Smackdown and Raw being 3hrs is way too much for my liking. Raw with 3hr content is good enough for me. Originally Posted by PSOjedi
By the way, I vote for WWE Amp'd. It's not the bad of a name actually.
Originally Posted by John Cena rapping on Paul Heyman
-
08-06-2012, 12:41 PM #13God
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- PARIS
- Posts
- 1,844
SD also need to be a 3 hours show, because superstars are waiting backstage for their time. Having a show on saturday would be a mistake for me, because the show would be quite the same as WWE Superstars, that "does not count", just like house shows. In fact WWE Superstars has become the 2nd "developmental-like" show of the WWE, after NXT (and of course FCW). When there is no place on SD/RAW for superstars who are not actually "good for business", WWE put them there and hope they will grow, and end on RAW or SD. With that Saturday show, it would be exactly the same, than WWE Superstars. Ok we would probably see good matches, but no storylines, no real promos.
I definitely think it is a bad idea. If they can make this show, then they can make SD a 3 hours show.
-
08-06-2012, 01:57 PM #14A 3hr Smackdown wouldn't solve anything though. Yes, it will get some guys on the main shows but they'll still be used the same; being used to put over other wrestlers. A 3hr Raw is enough to get more wrestlers on the main shows. Smackdown being a 3hr show like Raw just doesn't seem realistic. Originally Posted by John Cena rapping on Paul Heyman
-
08-06-2012, 02:09 PM #15The Trinity
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Waterford, Ireland
- Posts
- 4,253
Ah someone liked my ADR comment Originally Posted by johnnydropkicks
OT: Just call it Livewire for god sake!!
-
08-06-2012, 05:26 PM #16Black Ninja!
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- from West Virginia and now living in Virginia
- Posts
- 6,100
- Blog Entries
- 1
Saturday Morning Slam seems to be the best... Although they had Jakked already..
3 hours of Smackdown, you wouldn't need WWE Superstars then.... But 3 hours on a dead TV night like Friday unless you under a certain age.... it could hurt ratings??We all judge others even if it isn't our place to judge, but supposedly at the end we are all judged by one!!!
Wrestling, women and money who could ask for more???
-
08-06-2012, 05:50 PM #17Fresh Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Staten Island , New York
- Posts
- 83
I think a WWE show on Saturday is a good idea . I remember when I was younger how happy I was to watch WWE on a Saturday morning but then again this is before DVR and the internet exploding with wrestling content . I might still watch it however but probably not on Saturday lol
-
08-06-2012, 05:51 PM #18Fresh Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Staten Island , New York
- Posts
- 83
I voted for WWE Supercharge
-
08-06-2012, 07:03 PM #19Amp'd sounds the best.I'm jus sayin...
-
08-07-2012, 03:53 PM #20Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- The DMV
- Posts
- 615
Let's see...I can't decide between: WWE's One Saturday Morning, WWE Kids, WWE's Weekend Adventure, 4WWE Kids TV, Kid's WWE, WWE4Kids
...oops, it looks like all of those are already taken
The IWC is to TNA what the Republicans are to Obama: No matter how much good they do...as soon as they're shown to be less than perfect, the other claims that they just can't get anything right.
Bookmarks