Originally Posted by TheDevilsAdvocate
I'm going with this. I disqualify the reigns of Austin, Sammartino, Hogan, Backlund, Warrior, Hart, and everyone else pre-2002 when discussing this. Why? Because the WWF closed down in 2002. The WWE replaced it. If we look at it in this light, we have a relatively better comparison (10 years for both companies).
From 2002 to around 2004, WWE won, hands down.
2005 thru 2008ish, TNA took the reigns.
2008ish-2010 Give it to WWE.
2011 thru current, I say TNA.
Overall, in the current state we are viewing, TNA wins hands down without comparison. When incorporating the past 10 years, it's a split between the two in which some titles would swap their "prestige level" but both companies have had their fair share of problems in making their titles be the focal point of the product... TNA has seemed to remedy that problem at the moment, so they win for me.