
Originally Posted by
Peter Kaymakcian
I think to a certain extent you have to care about the ratings though. Because if the ratings aren't there you're not gonna make the money from advertisers and the networks will cancel your show. I think the problem is that both WWE and TNA aren't doing enough to make the fans interested in their product especially on TV.
The thing is, the only people who should care about ratings are the people in WWE involved with the overall concern for the publically traded company. Fans should not base their thoughts or opinions about a product off of these numbers. How many arguments are made for or against both WWE and TNA based on these numbers as to which is the “better” company or just how “well” a promotion is doing? These numbers should not be used as a basis for what YOU enjoy personally. They are samples used to derive a specific amount of revenue that a company is willing to invest into said show. If the market expands outside of the US (much like TNA with their global reach) then the company can use this as leverage in acquiring sponsors for a show without basing the amount of money gained by said sponsor from a number as simple as the United States ratings of a television program.

Originally Posted by
Peter Kaymakcian
We no longer see title changes on live television anymore and we never see enough matches that make people want to tune in anymore as well. I think the reason that wrestling is on a decline is because both of the top two companies have made complete fools out of the wrestling business and created a product that is so ridiculous that there are no more casual fans who will watch.
I am sorry that the booking of title exchanges and matches don’t fit the ideals of what you believe that they should be, but the top two companies aren’t to blame for making the wrestling business what it is. It’s the fact that the wrestling industry has indeed, turned into the wrestling business. When you are more focused on the revenue generation than you are about the desires wrestlers had going into the industry, then you find that the “art(or product)” will suffer in the long run. This is why I have pushed the idea that scripting wrestlers to a point of telling them how many chops in the corner they should use restricts the creative freedom needed to carry on excellent matches. I can say that Brett Hart called a 5 star match in the ring; I can’t say anyone currently in the WWE has done the same (sorry Punk fans).

Originally Posted by
Peter Kaymakcian
You used to be able to watch wrestling and not be embarassed, I'm not, but a lot of my friends talk about how bad wrestling is because of the ridiculousness of some of the characters and storylines. It wasn't like that when the ratings where at there peak. I think it's going to take the WWE to fall in order to fix the wrestling business because at this point in time they have done a lot of damage to the image of the wrestling business with storylines like Katie Vick and characters like Santino Marella and Brodus Clay.
And just so you know, it was like that when the ratings were at their peak. Val Venis had his member cut off by Kai-en-tai. They also brought in John Wayne Bobbitt to further the angle. Rikishi ran over Austin due to racism that kept him and his fellow Samoan, The Rock, down in the business for so long. GTV was showing many “superstars” in embarrassing moments, yet went away as quick as it came about. Mae Young and Mark Henry... These were all “ridiculous” and happened when ratings were indeed at their “peak” as you say. If they can make it past an 75 year old giving birth to a hand, Big Boss Man dragging the coffin of the Big Shows father across a cemetery, and the Katie Vick incident (which they were able to get passed since it occurred 10 years ago) then promoting talent that sells merchandise and provide entertainment to casual fans is something that I am not going to hate on the E Universe for. After all, they have to keep revenue coming in to keep stock holders happy.
Bookmarks