Originally Posted by Robstar
Haha, so get this right?
*TNA changed back to a 4 sided ring - obviously copying WWE
*Both companies feature wrestling - but I haven't worked out who's copying who, just yet.
*Both companies have someone named AJ - TNA is clearly the victim here!
*Both companies have womens wrestling that nobody gives two hoots about
*Karen Jarrett was a spectacularly huge and failed rip off of Vickie Guerrero - WWE wins on that one.
*The Beautiful People vs LayCool - we all know that was a blatant rip off
. Now, if anyone could have stayed awake long enough to really care...
*Zack Ryder vs Robbie E - WWE got there first and did it better!
*Both companies hired reputable indy talent. WWE - Daniel Bryan Danielson/CM Punk/Kassius Ohno etc TNA - Austin Aries/Doug Williams/Nigel McGuinness - what's up with that???
lol
*The referee storyline - WWE clearly ripping off TNA by having a ref get involved in a match controversially!!! One was an example of using a guy who was already a developmental wrestler and using him in several storylines with the champion - the other, an example of a guy who's not a wrestler but wants to be and trying to shoehorn him onto the roster by having him involved in a storyline with TNA's 'creative consultant' (or whatever he is) - who also happens to be HIS FATHER!!! Man, it's like the spitting image of the other!!!
*Both companies have annoying announcers that rattle on endlessly and needlessly.
*Josh Matthews is nothing but WWE trying to copy Jeremy Borash!
We could be here all day....
*TNA changed back to a 4 sided ring - obviously copying WWE
*Both companies feature wrestling - but I haven't worked out who's copying who, just yet.
*Both companies have someone named AJ - TNA is clearly the victim here!
*Both companies have womens wrestling that nobody gives two hoots about
*Karen Jarrett was a spectacularly huge and failed rip off of Vickie Guerrero - WWE wins on that one.
*The Beautiful People vs LayCool - we all know that was a blatant rip off
. Now, if anyone could have stayed awake long enough to really care...*Zack Ryder vs Robbie E - WWE got there first and did it better!
*Both companies hired reputable indy talent. WWE - Daniel Bryan Danielson/CM Punk/Kassius Ohno etc TNA - Austin Aries/Doug Williams/Nigel McGuinness - what's up with that???
lol*The referee storyline - WWE clearly ripping off TNA by having a ref get involved in a match controversially!!! One was an example of using a guy who was already a developmental wrestler and using him in several storylines with the champion - the other, an example of a guy who's not a wrestler but wants to be and trying to shoehorn him onto the roster by having him involved in a storyline with TNA's 'creative consultant' (or whatever he is) - who also happens to be HIS FATHER!!! Man, it's like the spitting image of the other!!!
*Both companies have annoying announcers that rattle on endlessly and needlessly.
*Josh Matthews is nothing but WWE trying to copy Jeremy Borash!
We could be here all day....
I've just relised this site is moderated by people who obviously are biased.Big sigh,oh Robster,where do it all go wrong?
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks