A Paul Heyman Faction?

**AWrestlingGod** · 10-24-2012, 10:19 PM

I love Paul Heyman and I feel like a faction for him would be great and if Punk and Lesnar is in it I can see a little feud between the two come out of it.

Throw in Dean Ambrose, Kassius Ohno, and Antonio Cesaro you have a great faction. Think about it The WWE Champion CM Punk, The Kings of Wrestling, The upcoming Dean Ambrose, and Brock Lesnar lead by Paul Heyman. THAT will boost the ratings.

Thoughts on a heyman stable? Who will you add, and do you think it will work?

**Pagey21** · 10-24-2012, 10:38 PM

I think this would be a great idea brock could capture the world heavy weight title the kings of wrestling obviously the tag team belts ambrose could capture the intercontinental with paul heyman as the mouth piece this is something id like to see ive just joined this site i stopped watching wrestling bout 09 and factions stables whatever you want to call them make it more interesting i started watching again when the nexus started which besides cm punk was the last great storyline the wwe has had

**Sicksnuff17** · 10-24-2012, 10:41 PM

Only if WWE writers would think the same thing

**Rick BoA** · 10-25-2012, 12:00 AM

CM Punk ruins factions so it probably wouldn't work.

**Robstar** · 10-25-2012, 12:11 AM

This idea has marks fainting worldwide. Me too hey!

**Iron Ape** · 10-25-2012, 12:15 AM

Originally Posted by Rick BoA

CM Punk ruins factions so it probably wouldn't work.

The Nexus was already failing before Punk even got added to the mix, and he was only added as an attempt to salvage the thing. I fail to see how that equates to Punk ruining factions.

**Robstar** · 10-25-2012, 12:32 AM

Originally Posted by Iron Ape

The Nexus was already failing before Punk even got added to the mix, and he was only added as an attempt to salvage the thing. I fail to see how that equates to Punk ruining factions.

No, no, no - you're forgetting that SES gimmick where they basically relied on him to speak for everybody and the writers didn't think things through to the point of realising that if you're going to do a Messiah/saviour like storyline, you need to have one of your followers rise up against you. With them having some degree of success. Which they.....did not. Spectacularly so.

**Darkside Ron Garvin** · 10-25-2012, 12:33 AM

Originally Posted by Iron Ape

The Nexus was already failing before Punk even got added to the mix, and he was only added as an attempt to salvage the thing. I fail to see how that equates to Punk ruining factions.

That's because the calculations he is using fail to take into the account element X which is the effort being put into the stable. Had Nexus not had all the wind taken out of the sails, a good battle between Barrett and Punk would have turned the comment made from incoherent to just plain silly. Though I might not be in favor of a "CM Punk" lead faction, it is in no way a reflection on his ability to carry a stable but more so geared to the fact that the stable being presented is a reincarnation of the Dangerous Alliance. Paul E. is perhaps the only person who would be able to re-create a "Heenan Family" type of stable and make it work.

**Iron Ape** · 10-25-2012, 12:40 AM

Originally Posted by Robstar

No, no, no - you're forgetting that SES gimmick where they basically relied on him to speak for everybody and the writers didn't think things through to the point of realising that if you're going to do a Messiah/saviour like storyline, you need to have one of your followers rise up against you. With them having some degree of success. Which they.....did not. Spectacularly so.

I didn't forget SES. I just don't see how Punk ruined it. If anything, he was the only thing that whole endeavor had going for it.