Originally Posted by magglis
And the post has NOTHING to do with the another squad taking over the top spot in the most valuable. If anything, they are failing to give you accurate data because Forbes (via the Forbes webstie, imagine that) doesn't have Dallas at the number 2 spot. If anything you are taking away from your argument because the website you posted took out Madrid from the #2 spot and put in an NFL team.
I read the link, but it is not jiving with the data that Forbes is putting out. Hence why you should source your data instead of just looking at the date and assuming it's factual. If forbes.com comes out with the same info, I will give it to you, but they haven't so if I am going to make a list based off of forbes data, I am going to use (here's the kicker) Forbes to back up my information.