Well, surprise surprise, the main complaint is that it's not the attitude era type of belt. You people have to learn how to move on. Things tasted better then, the sun was brighter, people were nicer, ice cream was free and plentiful and strangers greeted you in the street; yeah yeah, we get it - your memory makes things seem so much better than they were.
Examples of things people mistakenly recall fondly and/or examples of VERY misplaced taste - 1996-2001;
*The Attitude Era
*Two Guys, A Girl and A Pizza Place
*Jason Biggs
*Ja Rule
*Felicity(tv show)
*Clothing with flames
*Frosted tips
*The Attitude Era
*Celebrity Deathmatch
*The Nanny
*Fred Durst
*Tom Green
*Ren & Stimpy
*Beavis & Butthead
*Walker: Texas Ranger
*Korn
*Reality TV
*Blair Witch Project
*Millionaire Game Shows
*Hailey Joel Osment
*The Olsen Twins
*Austin Powers
*The Attitude Era
I could go on, but these are some prime examples of things that only had a few certain good things going for them or were even downright terrible-
but we loved anyway. It's only natural that people try to retroactively defend their choices but some were just shocking.
So it's not the best looking belt in the world - so what? Why are we concerned so much with the appearance of this belt? Does it make the holder look more legitimate? Does it make it harder for that certain section of fans to fap to? Or is it because now you have to go buy a new replica belt to complete your collection, even though you don't like the look of it?

Get real - WWE's style has moved on even if your hasn't. Enjoy your camo cargo pants and backwards cap for as long as you want, just don't expect the rest of the world to be mired in the same time freeze.
Bookmarks