You can't have two WWE championships. Oh look. 2012, the year of Punk and Cena both standing in the same ring with a 'legitimate' belt each. Just roll over and admit defeat my friend.
That was different. Punk "left the company" with their marquee title. Storyline wise, they thought he was gone for good so they had every right to crowm a new wwe champion. Punk came back and he essentially challenged cena for his belt. I will nevet admit defeat when i know im right. And no b-mac i havent given up on the debate. And it is a debate not an argument. Tool isnt riling me up or angering me. Just a competetive chat that I WILL WIN.
It is what it is, ya know. Hes basing his opinion off of reality as it seems and im basing mine purely off their storyline. Im sure when it gets closer to mitb and he still hasnt cashed in, cole will say he has till the ppv about 50 times every times we see dolph.
You guys are acting like they can't type up another imaginary contract and hang it for 6 more guys to go after. When has WWE EVER said that there can only be ONE MITB case holder for the belt at one time? Never. I think it's a great idea and could lead to a huge triple threat at SummerSlam between Orton, Ziggler and someone like Sheamus or Jericho.
You guys are acting like they can't type up another imaginary contract and hang it for 6 more guys to go after. When has WWE EVER said that there can only be ONE MITB case holder for the belt at one time? Never. I think it's a great idea and could lead to a huge triple threat at SummerSlam between Orton, Ziggler and someone like Sheamus or Jericho.
Exactly. Sense at last.
The Royal Rumble is the largest singles match ever.
Bookmarks