
Originally Posted by
K2Jelly
So you think that a rating, that only restricts language, intense violence, blood and sexually suggestive scenes, is responsible for bad creative management and horrible foresight? Isn't that not giving credit to the compelling storylines, excellent wrestling and in-ring psychology which are the actual heart and soul of a wrestling show?
How much of attitude had excellent wrestling really? I say nearly the same amount as now.
Compelling Storyline? Without Violence, Language, over 18 stuff in genereal etc...Attitude era's would storylines wouldn't been that great.
PG restricts more things then you would imagine, obviously there's other reasons now that are also holding back WWE (Bonkers owner, Politics, Bad luck, bad management, Linda etc...) but I'm saying PG is a huge factor also.
Bookmarks