The movie discussion thread

[Darkside Ron Garvin]

Amazing Spiderman 6/10.Nowhere close to Spiderman 1 and 2.Even Spiderman 3 its better.Only good part of this movie was was Emma Stone's acting,and i'm not a fan of Emma Stone.Not enough action for 130 min or impressive scenes for 230m budget.Oh and why the hell Garfield was playing as a "bully" Spiderman

I can't say you are wrong as I have yet to see Amazing Spiderman, but I must say I HATED the Spiderman series with Toby as the quick-to-weep Parker character so this movie would have to be an amazing pile of shit for me to consider it less that that series.

[magglis]

I can't say you are wrong as I have yet to see Amazing Spiderman, but I must say I HATED the Spiderman series with Toby as the quick-to-weep Parker character so this movie would have to be an amazing pile of shit for me to consider it less that that series.

I can't disagree with you because its your opinion about the Spiderman movies.Opinions are like assholes everybody has one haha
But if you didn't like the previous Spiderman movies(and i'm a big fan of the first two)then i don't expect from you to like this one

[Iron Ape]

I can't disagree with you because its your opinion about the Spiderman movies.Opinions are like assholes everybody has one haha
But if you didn't like the previous Spiderman movies(and i'm a big fan of the first two)then i don't expect from you to like this one

I haven't seen it myself, but I do have a handful of friends who didn't like the Raimi movies but were really surprised by how much they liked the reboot. I'm not sure how you came to think that not liking one thing leads to not liking another thing.

[magglis]

I haven't seen it myself, but I do have a handful of friends who didn't like the Raimi movies but were really surprised by how much they liked the reboot. I'm not sure how you came to think that not liking one thing leads to not liking another thing.

Not sure too,haha.I suppose because i found the previous movies good and this one bad then he won't like it,keeping in mind what he said about the previous Spiderman movies

[Rich Cranium]

They're still alive to me dammit!

Did you see the movie? It was big in Australia.

[Darkside Ron Garvin]

Not sure too,haha.I suppose because i found the previous movies good and this one bad then he won't like it,keeping in mind what he said about the previous Spiderman movies

Understandable, but much like you said about opinions, I try to make my own based on what I saw. Much like how many people stated that Jarhead was better than Hurt Locker. I just finished watching Hurt Locker and I have to say I was never once bored in the movie. In Jarhead, I found myself waiting for action that never came; hence I think Hurt Locker was a better movie

As for the Spidey movies, I am on the opposite side from you. I found the 3rd movie to be quite enjoayable simply based on T. Grace's ability to play Eddie Brock. I was extremely let down when they announced him to be Venom, but I was proven wrong with his performance as the character. I think the first McGwire Spidey was the best based off of DaFoe and Franco alone, but the second was a hiddeous cup of bile laced with the tears of Peter Parker.

[clrj3514]

I finally watched Forrest Gump tonight... awesome movie.

[clrj3514]

I watch a lot of stuff with my mum and it can feel a bit strange. I really resent most sex scenes as I just find them unnecessary and anything but sexy. But didn't they used to love whacking sex scenes into a movie? Then porn became a lot more accessible and thank god, it petered out

He...... he.......hehe

[akbar]

Anyone who's a fan of The Shining and one of the best directors ever Stanley Kubrick in general should look forward a documentary called Room 237. I'm hearing some good stuff about it.

[magglis]

Anyone who's a fan of The Shining and one of the best directors ever Stanley Kubrick in general should look forward a documentary called Room 237. I'm hearing some good stuff about it.

What's the documentary about?The shining?Stanley Kubrick?