Originally Posted by bcfccalum
Completely agree. There is no real shocker to match stimultions (expect maybe Extreme Rules) but yeah no surprise whatsoever. Plus gimmick matches used to have a meaning to particular feuds like HIAC and Ironman matches usually meant when a rivarly has gotten to such a heated point that this is where it would end. Anyways:
RR-Good. Better than good. It is a brilliant concept with so much heart and emotion put into it.
EC-I feel as if the Elimination Chamber Match should be moved in the Summer and put No Way Out here. That way, again more surprise. Plus it takes away meaning from the EC when you know whose going to win.
Extreme Rules-The one thing I do like about this pay per view is that every match has some stimulation. However, it keeps Wrestlemania from really having any gimmick matches cause it is right afterwards so yeah.
HIAC-Gets watered down and takes away it's meaning.
MITB-Although it was kind of cool to see it in the summer for once, it takes away so many superstars off the Wrestlemania card and takes away something to look forward at Wrestlemania. I mean when Undertaker retires, the streak concept is gone. Then what? All you got it singles and tag matches.
SS-Love the idea. Really helps a bunch of talent get on the card with these elimination tag matches.
TLC-Obvious who gets what match in the build up towards it. Plus the ladder match gets watered down.