Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: TNA Ratings

  1. #31
    Normal Member RevolutionIcon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    241
    Quote Originally Posted by blackout version 1 View Post
    TNA !! Get rid of Hogan as an on screen character . Bring back the 6 sided ring , chris daniels , austin aries, low ki and roderick strong . Get rid of the K.O tag belt and the TV title and the dead waste they collected from WWE !! Bring in Davey Richards, Prince Devitt and some other international wrestlers . Also AJ Styles should be treated better along with Joe he shouldnt be put to mid card to suit the new wwe reject ! Its a joke to thing doug willams has been on impact in weeks he one of the best in the business and the same could be said for desmond wolfe but yet week after week you see immortal with zero talent and 3 old men who just wont give up on repeating their so called glory days . Fuck Hogan , nostalgia is well and truly gone along with the 1980's so SUCK IT brother !
    I agree but, I'd rather not see Doug Williams for at least another two weeks. Hernandez dropped him on his head pretty fucking hard.
    "If you cannot read this, you are illiterate. Being illiterate in present society while owning a computer and actually expecting people to hold validity in the authenticity of your qualifications makes you stupid." - This means school didn't work for you, and life probably won't either.

    I'd drive her out to the middle of nowhere too. lmfao

  2. #32
    My view on this is that TNA grew VERY fast from 2002 - 2007. Since 2007 they have plateaud so it's not their fault. You have to be realistic about it, ECW was a small company that was stuck in a bingo hall and they were stuck around 1.0 rating. TNA acts like a small company; "celebs" they get are never the main attraction and always "extras"; The impact zone is awful and looks tiny on tv; every opportunity they try and take shots at WWE (or the other company or the company "up north") which jericho points out that they should not even been thinking of WWE at all.

    G
    GMU - UTID!
     
    2012 - 2nd!

  3. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by HCollins-TNA1 View Post
    I think i have said it before TNA Impact ratings is much like Raws ratings in the 90s..... It grew year after year finally climaxing in around 1999/2000/2001......
    If that is any sign who know TNA might be pulling off 1.5s and 1.7 by next year if not a 2.0???
    Well if TNA were pulling in 8.0s then i'd agree that they are much like Raws. Not many weekly TV shows EVER get above 8.0 and stay there. It wasn't raw that plateaud, but wrestling in general. WCW was starting to decline and so was ECW around 2000. I really doubt they will jump to 2.0 so quickly. TNA needs to market themselves because there are still many people who don't even know it exists. It gets marketed quite a lot in the UK which is why a lot know about it and it gets good viewership (% of viewers per population is higher in the UK than USA)

    G
    GMU - UTID!
     
    2012 - 2nd!

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

© 2011 eWrestlingNews, All Rights Reserved.