
Originally Posted by
Iron Ape
No, but I don't define a natural in broadcasting by whether or not they know the names of specific wrestling moves. It has more to do with their effectiveness in projecting, communicating, and engaging an audience. Then again, I'm pretty familiar with most wrestling terminology, so having someone parrot what it is that I know I'm looking directly right at isn't of as much importance to me as it apparently is to others, so I'm more inclined to forgive such trivialities.
To me, a much bigger issue with Cole is how he puts over other talent. But considering that he's just saying what he's instructed to say, I can't even really hold that against him, either. The person who should be being held responsible for all of the perceived flaws with commentary at the moment is the one putting the words in the voice of the WWE's mouth.
I have to disagree with you. I agree that Cole is doing what he's told, and that he's putting over the heels. I have no problem with his heel character, and I find it enjoyable watching him drool over Miz etc. BUT, at the end of the day, he's a commentator, and a commentator's main job is to call the action. He's simply not doing that. I'm also familiar with wrestling terminology, and moves, but I still expect the commentator to call the action. It's the same in any other sport, or sports entertainment.
Bookmarks