WWE: Do they need more titles?

[beatfighter3000]

I don't particularly know myself. I've noticed there is a lot of good talent in this company that aren't being given their fair share of the spotlight. So I asked myself, would the WWE benefit from having more titles, to allow lower rated superstars a chance to show what they're worth? or could this be done with the titles we currently have?

What do you think?

[PandaMassacre]

I would not say that they need more titles. They just need one title; That would either be the cruiserweight championship or the lightweight championship for the smaller guys. IMHO though they turned the United States an Intercontinental Championships into those type of championships.

[Tomsta666]

I think 6 is more than enough :P

[SESAfro]

It feels like more is needed because there is such a small amount of people being used in rivalries and such. We wouldn't feel that way if that if they didn't feel like rocks in the background.

[PandaMassacre]

It feels like more is needed because there is such a small amount of people being used in rivalries and such. We wouldn't feel that way if that if they didn't feel like rocks in the background.

I would not mind there being another belt for guys like Chris Masters. I think those guys are being underutilized an they should at least be awarded in some capacity for their efforts to entertain the crowd before the main show starts. Those guys are also raking in viewers for Superstars.

[tad locust]

There doesn't need to be more championship's,The low rated wrestlers just need more TV time.

[SESAfro]

I would not mind there being another belt for guys like Chris Masters. I think those guys are being underutilized an they should at least be awarded in some capacity for their efforts to entertain the crowd before the main show starts. Those guys are also raking in viewers for Superstars.

Yeah. Like European title-esk. But, they aren't really being used so we wonder what's happening with them. If they have a small fued it wouldn't be that obvious.

[PandaMassacre]

There doesn't need to be more championship's,The low rated wrestlers just need more TV time.

This is true. I think they should put more storylines into Superstars or they should at least try to create a 3rd (Smackdown or Raw) valued show for those guys.

[PandaMassacre]

Yeah. Like European title-esk. But, they aren't really being used so we wonder what's happening with them. If they have a small fued it wouldn't be that obvious.

I completely forgot about the European championship! Not to be a nationality label'er or anything but I think they should create a championship kind of like that belt an give it to Wade Barret. The guy was screwed out of numerous championship opportunities, and the guy went from being the hottest talent in WWE to delivering wastelands to indy talents in dark matches.

[S.E. Zero]

Why is it the TV Championship is never considered as a belt that can be introduced into the WWE?

Its a good title that's not biased to weight (cruiserweight) or nationality (european) plus it gets defended often on TV, ECW had one and since they own ECW its a perfect gateway to bring a defunct championship back to life.

It could be defended on Superstars among those low level talents and brought to big shows every few months and shared among all the Superstars among Raw, Smackdown and Superstars so everyone at least have a chance to be champion while they are in the WWE.

Guys like Reks, Bourne or Masters could finally get some gold, I dont know about you guys but this championship to me makes the most sense to bring back.