
Originally Posted by
Wade Barrett 1979
I may take you up on that in the future.
There's just no middle ground there, you either get the idiots who slate it for ridiculous reasons or you get the siege mentality brigade who, if you slightly criticise any aspect of the product, call you a WWE mark.

I know, it gets to be pretty ridiculous between the ones who claim that it "IS NOT WWE COMPETITION", will never be close to WWE, and that it has the most ridiculous story lines (which I can name several "questionable" ones the E has thrown out there). The sad part is, you have their counter parts in TNA radicals who blow it's greatness out of the water. Yes, it is awesome and I like it a lot, but the idea that Dixie will buy out VKM... Really?
Either way, as long as the topic stays to what an individual appreciates versus what they don't appreciate, the conversation involved in a TNA discussion can be endless. It's when the claims of demise or speculation as to TNA's "rank" (all of which is subjective to a person’s view of the organization) comes into discussion that I tend to get turned off by the topic.
Bookmarks