Chocolate Blades of Thunder

[Automatic]

I don't understand how they confirm the loss though when they're still tallying votes.

Extrapolate I'd guess, but I don't know what formula they use.

[Darkside Ron Garvin]

Extrapolate I'd guess, but I don't know what formula they use.

Makes sense for the time being but doesn't on the whole since the polls just closed 3 mins ago in that state. That's why I don't like live tracking these things; because of stuff like this

[Dennis]

63-36 now.

she is still losing right?

[Darkside Ron Garvin]

she is still losing right?

Yeppers... She has 39% to Murphy's 60%

[Darkside Ron Garvin]

Makes sense for the time being but doesn't on the whole since the polls just closed 3 mins ago in that state. That's why I don't like live tracking these things; because of stuff like this

It's like the fact that they're calling Alabama for Romney with 1% of the vote in. I do think Alabama ends up a Romney state, but with and hour left and MANY more votes to total, no one should be calling a state that only has 1% of the registered votes in.

[Automatic]

Makes sense for the time being but doesn't on the whole since the polls just closed 3 mins ago in that state. That's why I don't like live tracking these things; because of stuff like this

Hey, THEY GOTTA BE THE FIRST! They need the page hits, TV ratings, everything else you can come up with that could be a viable parameter for a broadcasting company, or else nobody cares about them.
Also, the chance of actually extrapolating the wrong person to win must have gone considerably down over time. Especially with all the new technology.

she is still losing right?

Yeah, that would be a safe bet.

[Grind_Bastard]

CNN projection indicates Linda losing too.

[Automatic]

It's like the fact that they're calling Alabama for Romney with 1% of the vote in. I do think Alabama ends up a Romney state, but with and hour left and MANY more votes to total, no one should be calling a state that only has 1% of the registered votes in.

Yeah, that's a bit far-fetched. A believable percentage, at least for me, would be 66% minimum.
McMahon was 10-89 after 1% percent of the votes and look where she is now!

[Grind_Bastard]

Yeah, that's a bit far-fetched. A believable percentage, at least for me, would be 66% minimum.
McMahon was 10-89 after 1% percent of the votes and look where she is now!

LOL at bolded.

[Automatic]

El Hija de Linda.