Jim Ross has posted a new blog entry. Here are the highlights…
On Monday's Paul Bearer Angle: For those complaining about the usage of Paul Bearer's image less than a week after his sudden passing last Tuesday at the age of 58, I suggest that they relax. I'm guessing that I knew Percy better than most complaining within the internet wrestling community and I can say without hesitation that he would have loved how his TV persona was honored notwithstanding how he contributed to one more storyline leading into WrestleMania.
On CM Punk: Punk interrupting the final moments of the opening Paul Bearer tribute was villainy 101. As a matter of fact, I felt like Punk had more antagonist angst when Raw was going off the air than he did when he first arrived on the scene in the first segment of the show. The idea is to motivate fans to pay to see the villain get his ass handed to him and if that theory is accurate then WWE succeeded in regards to the Taker-Punk 'Streak' match at WM29.
On Using Cena's Divorce on WWE TV: WWE utilizing John Cena's divorce in the WWE Title video package surprised me. However, it made perfect sense and is an issue that most people can relate to in some fashion. It also helps realistically explain Cena's own self proclaimed downward spiral in 2012.
On Lesnar and Heyman: Lesnar is a nasty albeit talented leviathan who is, seemingly, staying low key, all the while knowing in his athletic heart that he will do all he can to steal the show from his peers on April 7. Paul Heyman @HeymanHustle had another effective, succinct promo that told me what I needed to know. Let the speculation begin on what the stipulation will be once HHH officially signs the contract to face the Psycho Viking at WM29.
If you're interested, you can read the full blog by clicking here.