Foley new 682x400 763475a
Mick Foley
Michael Francis Foley
  • Birthdate: 06/07/1965 (age 49)
  • Height: 6'2"
  • Weight: 287 Ib

Mick Foley has worked for many wrestling promot...

Read More »
WWE.com has posted this interview with Mick Foley and Kevin Nash talking about January 4th, 1999 which is the night that Foley won the WWF title and WCW ran the "Fingerpoke of Doom" angle. Check out the highlights:

Foley on what the night means to him: "In retrospect, if people say it's the night that changed wrestling, I'll believe it. I'm happy to take that credit, but certainly think it was a night that changed people's perception about me within the wrestling industry...When the taping results came out, and there was the instantaneous switching of hundreds of thousands of TV sets, I think I went from being a highly recognized role player to a leading man in WWE. I still sometimes wonder if I wasn't just a very good role player, but at least for a period of time, the results begged to differ."

Nash on the significance of the night: "That was the night that changed wrestling? Oh, I disagree...The year that [Mike] Tyson showed up for WrestleMania [XIV] in '98 changed wrestling. Who thinks Jan. 4, '99, changed wrestling? A lot of [know-it-all fans]? It was already back and forth at that point with who won Mondays, so how did that change anything?"

Nash on the idea that momentum shifted to WWE "in a spiritual sense" at that point: "I don't believe in it. There's nothing spiritual about it. When Tyson came to WrestleMania, Vince knew that everybody was going to be watching that WrestleMania. They put a movie-trailer-quality piece before every match that caught everybody up to date if you hadn't been watching the show every week. It got a great buyrate. When I watched that WrestleMania, I said, "We're dead in the water." That's what changed wrestling...You're not talking to some [know-it-all]. You're talking to somebody that was in the process, in the middle of it. We could never out-produce Vince. Our production was never anywhere near Vince's production. And then Vince went edgier than we were, and all of a sudden standards and practices started pulling the cord back on us. Raw became the hip show and we became the un-hip show."

On the signficance of the Fingerpooke of Doom: "The "Fingerpoke of Doom" was nothing. The "Fingerpoke of Doom" was just trying to realign The nWo to face off with Goldberg and Goldberg ended up getting injured. I love how the story of my life is how I beat Goldberg to turn around and take the "Fingerpoke of Doom" a week later. Boy, that did me a lot of good. When you look at how people perceive the whole thing, it's ridiculous...The number one problem people have with the "Fingerpoke of Doom" is it "got" everybody. And nobody likes to be "got." So, of course, [know-it-alls] are going to hate it the most because they never called it. They didn't see anything coming."

On whether the fingerpoke was a reaction to hearing that Foley was winning the title: "Oh, we didn't care what WWE was doing. We were more worried about when Sable would come out, because those quarter-hour ratings of Raw would go through the roof. It was planned for about two or three weeks. It got to the point where people were disenchanted because Goldberg was undefeated. When we went to WWE's territory in Salisbury, Md., people were chanting "Goldberg sucks." They started pumping in the "Goldberg" chants and it became a situation where they were trying to fabricate a situation that had been organic."

Foley on whether the WWE locker room was aware of what WCW was doing each Monday night: "Oh sure, yeah. I wasn't aware about what had happened on Nitro that night until I saw it play out on Jan. 4. I think too much of the credit goes to me individually when a lot of the credit should go to WCW for putting on a really bad show that night. The arresting of Goldberg I thought was terrible. And for a long time, I thought WCW had the hot hand in the wrestling war. I would watch their show and go, "Wow, they've just got that edge that we don't seem to have." But by the time the ratings tide turned in our favor, I believe we had the better show for well more than a year. I'm not picking on Nitro, because they had some great shows, but that particular night stood out to me for being particularly bad."

Foley on why that night was particularly bad: "I always say there's no steadfast formula for getting a show right. There are some nights when Raw seems to go better than others. The show hooks people and the action is compelling. There are other nights that doesn't seem...