Was Brock Lesnar the right man to break the streak? Yes or No?

The moment where no one really understood what was going on was when the bell rang and it wasn’t undertaker celebrating at the grandest stage of them all it was his unworthy opponent Brock Lesnar! The man is a part timer who hasn’t done anything significant for the company since returning except for putting over some big names and vice versa, and he gets to receive the greatest accomplishment of any wrestling accomplishment? Really? I mean this opportunity could of made a young upcoming stars career or made a veterans last match a one to remember. But no WWE makes Undertaker lose to a man who had no relevance in the actual build up to their storyline, without Paul Heymen the audience would of been fast asleep yes Brock is a big man but is he anything super special compared to The Undertaker? No? Please do comment and leave your opinions and ideas.